Consociationalism as a Minimal Benchmark for Normative Theory

Keywords: consociationalism, Arend Lijphart, justice and peace, minimal normativity, normative theory

Abstract


This article argues that consociationalism, an instrument for managing deeply divided societies, can also be understood as a form of minimal normative political theory. Drawing on Arend Lijphart’s consociational model of democracy and juxtaposing it with the heavyweight theoretical models of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas, the article presents the model not merely as a functional compromise but as a morally grounded framework suited to contexts of deep pluralism and mistrust. Lijphart’s consociational model is a morally grounded framework founded on three principles: coexistence without resolution (pluralism), peace as a precondition for justice, and institutional design as a moral choice. In this light, the model can serve as a minimal benchmark of what counts as a normative theory.

References

Berlin, I. (1961). Does political theory still exist? In: P. Laslett & W. G. Runciman (Eds.), Politics, Philosophy, and Society (pp. 143–172). Oxford: Blackwell.

Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In: I. Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty (pp. 118–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bogaards, M. (2019). Consociationalism and centripetalism: Friends or foes? Swiss Political Science Review, 25(4), 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12371

Bogaards, M., Helms, L., & Lijphart, A. (2019). The importance of consociationalism for twenty-first century politics and political science. Swiss Political Science Review, 25(4), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12384

Boynton, G. R., & Kwon, W. H. (1978). An analysis of consociational democracy. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 3(1), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/439677

Buckler, S. (2010). Normative theory. In: D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science (3rd ed.) (pp. 156–180). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Horowitz, D. L. (1991). A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Horowitz, D. L. (2004). Some realism about constitutional engineering. In: A. Wimmer, R. Köchler, & J. Goldstone (Eds.), Facing Ethnic Conflicts: Toward a New Realism (pp. 245–257). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Kopecký, P. (Ed.) (2007). Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe. London: Routledge.

Lijphart, A. (1969). Consociational democracy. World Politics, 21(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009820

Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Lijphart, A. (2008). Thinking About Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. London – New York: Routledge.

Lorwin, V. (1975). Belgium: Conflict and compromise. In: K. D. MacRae (Ed.), Consociational Democracy (pp. 179–206). Toronto: McLelland and Stewart.

Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political. London – New York: Routledge.

Papagianni, K. (2008). Power Sharing, Transitional Governments and the Role of Mediation. Geneva: HD Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue.

Pogge, T. (2007). John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.

Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Scharding, T. K., & Warren, D. E. (2024). When are norms prescriptive? Understanding and clarifying the role of norms in behavioral ethics research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 34(2), 331–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2023.11

Semenov, A. (2020). Kosovo: A silent European consensus. International Studies, 57(4), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881720962939

Steiner, J. (1975). The principles of majority and proportionality. In: K. D. MacRae (Ed.), Consociational Democracy (pp. 63–70). Toronto: McLelland and Stewart.

Семенов, А. (2022). У одбрану политичке филозофије. Зборник Матице српске за друштвене науке, 183, 347–359. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN2283347S

Published
2025/10/17
Section
Original Scientific Paper