Teacher's identification of students with reading difficulties in the upper grades of elementary school
Abstract
Introduction. Teachers play a key role in detecting students with reading difficulties, yet identifying older elementary students who mainly read silently remains challenging. Traditional fluency assessments focus on oral reading and do not fully capture reading efficiency—the integration of fluent, automatic decoding and real-time comprehension. This study develops and provides initial validity evidence for the Speed Reading Test (SRT), a silent-reading measure of reading efficiency, and examines its links to comprehension and academic outcomes. Aim. To provide initial validity evidence for the SRT as a silent-reading measure of reading efficiency and examine its associations with teacher-rated reading ability, language background, prior additional professional support (APS), and grades in key subjects. Methods. The sample comprised 1.315 students (653 fifth- and 662 eighth-graders) from 17 Slovenian primary schools. Data included gender, first language, APS history, teacher-rated reading, and final grades. The 25-item timed SRT was administered alongside reading comprehension, vocabulary, and syntax tests. Independent-samples t-tests and Pearson correlations examined subgroup differences and associations with achievement. SRT cut-offs were determined by comparison with comprehension scores. Results. Girls outperformed boys, with the gap widening by Grade 8. Students from non-Slovene-speaking homes and those with APS scored significantly lower on the SRT. The SRT correlated strongly with teacher-rated reading (r ≈ .63) and moderately with school grades (r = .45–.57, p < .01). A 20th-percentile cut-off helped identify students at potential risk of poor comprehension. Conclusions. The SRT is a practical classroom tool for identifying upper-grade students whose silent-reading difficulties hinder achievement. Combined with teacher observations, it supports timely, data-informed instruction and progress monitoring.
References
Alt, S. J., & Samuels, S. J. (2010). Reading fluency. In V. A. McGill-Franzen, R. L. Allington, G. Hruby, J. Elkins, P. Johnston, S. J. Samuels, S. Hupp, V. Risko, P. Anders, W. Rupley, & V. L. Willson (Eds.), Handbook of reading disability research. Routledge. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203853016.ch16
Biancarosa, G., & Shanley, L. (2016). What is fluency? In K. Cummings & Y. Petscher (Eds.), The fluency construct (pp. 1–19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2803-3_1
Cameron, T. A., Schaughency, E., Taumoepeau, M., McPherson, C., & Carroll, J. L. D. (2023). School-entry skills and early skill trajectories predict reading after 1 year. School Psychology, 38(4), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000544
Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Denton, C. A., Barth, A. E., Fletcher, J. M., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T., Romain, M., & Francis, D. J. (2011). The relations among oral and silent reading fluency and comprehension in middle school: Implications for identification and instruction of students with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(2), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623546
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3
Guthrie, J. T. (2015). Growth of motivations for cognitive processes of reading. In P. D. Pearson & E. H. Hiebert (Eds.), Research-based practices for teaching Common Core literacy (pp. 107–122). Teachers College Press.
Hammill, D. D., Wiederholt, J. L., & Allen, E. A. (2006). Test of silent contextual reading fluency. Pro-Ed.
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.
Kim, Y.-S. G., & Wagner, R. K. (2015). Text (oral) reading fluency as a construct in reading development: An investigation of its mediating role for children from grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(3), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1007375
Lipec Stopar, M. (2005). Taksonomija težav bralnega razumevanja na osnovi latentne strukture branja [Doctoral dissertation, Univerza v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fakulteta]. https://search.worldcat.org/title/Taksonomija-tezav-bralnega-razumevanja-na-osnovi-latentne-strukture-branja-:-doktorska-disertacija/oclc/448088190
Martins, M. A., & Capellini, S. A. (2021). Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 34(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/smallbook
Pečjak, S. (1995). Ravni razumevanja in strategije branja. Diferent.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730
Petscher, Y., Cabell, S. Q., Catts, H. W., Compton, D. L., Foorman, B. R., Hart, S. A., Lonigan, C. J., Phillips, B. M., Schatschneider, C., Steacy, L. M., Terry, N. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2020). How the science of reading informs 21st-century education. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S267–S282. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.352
Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510-519. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.6.2
Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED483166.pdf
Rasinski, T. V., Reutzel, D. R., Chard, D., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2010). Reading fluency. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume IV (pp. 286–319). Routledge. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203840412.ch13
Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Spichtig, A. N., Hiebert, E. H., Vorstius, C., Pascoe, J. P., Pearson, P. D., & Radach, R. (2016). The decline of comprehension-based silent reading efficiency in the United States: A comparison of current data with performance in 1960. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.137
Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., & Denton, C. A. (2010). The efficacy of repeated reading and wide reading practice for high school students with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00296.x
Wissinger, D. R., Truckenmiller, A. J., Konek, A. E., & Ciullo, S. (2024). The validity of two tests of silent reading fluency: A meta-analytic review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 40(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2023.2175340
Wren, S. (2001). The cognitive foundations of learning to read: A framework. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. https://www.sedl.org/reading/framework/
Copyright (c) 2026 Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Self-archiving policy.