ANTI-EVASION PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO VALUE-ADDED TAX IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Abstract
Value Added Tax (VAT) is more susceptible to tax evasion compared to other forms of taxation, primarily due to the credit-invoice mechanism and the relatively high standard rate, both of which contribute to a higher volume of evaded tax revenue.
In this paper, the author examines three anti-evasion measures provided for under the legal framework of the Republic of Serbia. One such measure is the reverse charge mechanism, which requires the recipient of the supply to report and account for the tax liability, as specified on the invoice. This regime applies only to certain categories of transactions.
Where the application of the reverse charge mechanism is not feasible, the tax administration may resort to two additional anti-evasion tools: the secondary tax liability (or derivative tax liability) and the principle of economic substance over form. Each of these measures has inherent limitations.
Assuming that the protection of national fiscal interests is imperative, and recognizing the need for further alignment of Serbia’s VAT legislation with the acquis communautaire in this area, the author recommends amendments to the existing legal provisions aimed at enhancing the efficiency of VAT collection and reducing opportunities for tax evasion.
References
References
Annacondia, F. (2022). EU VAT Compass 2022/23. Amsterdam: IBFD.
Bergedahl, C. (2018). Anti-Abuse Measures in Tax Treaties Following the OECD Multilateral Instrument – Part 1. Bulletin for International Taxation. 72(I). 11 – 30.
Buettner, T., Tassi, A. (2023). VAT fraud and reverse charge: empirical evidence from VAT return data. International Tax and Public Finance. 30(III). 849–878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-023-09776-y
de la Feria, R. (2020). Tax Fraud and Selective Law Enforcement. Journal of Law and Society, 47(II). 240 – 270.
Frunza, M. C. (2020). Value added tax fraud. London and New York: Routledge.
Greggi, M. (2008). Avoidance and Abus De Droit: The European Approach in Tax Law. eJournal of Tax Research. 6(I). 23 - 44.
Govind, S., Zolles, S., (2018). The Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive. in: Lang, M. et al. (eds.), Introduction to European Tax Law on Direct Taxation (pp. 218 – 253). Vienna: Linde.
Gomes, M. L. (2019). The DNA of the Principle Purpose Test in the Multilateral Instrument. Intertax, 47(I). 66-90.
Hummel D., (2024). CJEU: Substance over form “principle” and new tendencies, in: Kofler, G. et al. (eds), Recent Developments in Value Added Tax (pp. 59 – 67). Vienna: Linde.
Ilić-Popov, G. (2016). Poreska krivična dela u srpskom poreskom zakonodavstvu. Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo. 21(I). 41 – 56.
Kostić, S. (2016). Načelo fakticiteta u srpskom poreskom pravu. Harmonius. 5/2016. 112 – 130.
Kostić, J., Pavlović, Z. (2020). Poreski delikti u zakonodavstvu Savezne Republike Nemačke. Strani pravni život. 64(I). 141 – 153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/spz64-25515.
Lazarov, I., (2018). The Relevance of the Fundamental freedoms for Direct Taxation. in: Lang, M. et al. (eds.), Introduction to European Tax Law on Direct Taxation (pp. 63 – 101). Vienna: Linde.
Milošević, M. (2014) Nezakonita evazija poreza na dodatu vrednost. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu – Centar za izdavaštvo.
Prebble, J. (2015). Kelsen, the Principle of Exclusion of Contradictions, and General Anti-Avoidance Rules in Tax Law. WU International Taxation Research Paper Series, 23/2015. 1 – 26.
Popović, D. (2017). Poresko pravo, Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu – Centar za izdavaštvo.
Smith, S. C., Keen, M. (2007). VAT Fraud and Evasion: What Do We Know, and What Can be Done?, International monetary Fund, Working Paper No. 2007/031. 1 – 33, Retrieved 10, October 2024, from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2007/wp0731.pdf
Terra, B., Kajus, J. (2024). A Guide to the European VAT Directives. Volume 1: Introduction to European VAT. Amsterdam: IBFD.
Waerzeggers, C., Hillier, C. (2016). Introducing a general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) - Ensuring that a GAAR achieves its purpose, Tax Law IMF Technical Note. 1/2016. 1 – 10.
Živković, L. (2022). The Unshell Directive Proposal in a Nutshell: Open Questions. Strani pravni život. 66(IV). 367-386, DOI: https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_22402KJ.
Živković, L. (2023). Opšta antiabuzivna pravila, doktorska disertacija, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Legislative sources
Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value-added tax, OJ L347 (2006).
Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market, art. 6, OJ L 193 (2016).
Council Directive (EU) 2022/890 of 3 June 2022 amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the extension of the application period of the optional reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of certain goods and services susceptible to fraud and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud, OJ L 155 (2022).
Commission Staff Workig Document, Serbia 2023 Report, SWD(2023) 695 final, Brussels, 8.11.2023.
Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the extension of the application period of the optional reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of certain goods and services susceptible to fraud and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud, section 1, COM (2022) 39 final.
Кривични законик, Службени гласник РС, бр. 85(2005), 88(2005) - испр., 107(2005) - испр., 72(2009), 111(2009), 121(2012), 104(2013), 108(2014), 94(2016) и 35(2019).
Закон о порезу на додату вредност, Службени гласник РС, број 84(2004), 86(2004) - исправка, 61(2005), 61(2007), 93(2012), 108(2013), 68(2014) - др. закон, 142(2014), 83(2015), 108(2016), 113(2017), 30(2018), 72(2019), 153(2020), 138(2022) Пречишћен текст закључно са изменама из Сл. гл. РС бр. 138(2022) које су у примени од 01/01/2023, и 94(2024).
Закон о пореском поступку и пореској администрацији, Службени гласник РС, број 80(2002), 84(2002) - исправка, 23(2003) - исправка, 70(2003), 55(2004), 61(2005), 85(2005) - др. закон, 62(2006) - др. закон, 61(2007), 20(2009), 72(2009) - др. закон, 53(2010), 101(2011), 2(2012) - исправка, 93(2012), 47(2013), 108(2013), 68(2014), 105(2014), 112(2015), 15(2016), 108(2016), 30(2018), 95(2018), 86(2019), 144(2020), 96(2021), 138(2022), Пречишћен текст закључно са изменама из „Службени гласник РС“ број 138(2022) које су у примени од 20/12/2022, и 94(2024).
Case Law
Case C-384/04 Commissioners of Customs & Excise and Attorney General v Federation of Technological Industries and Others [2006] ECR I-04191.
Case C-6/16, Eqiom and Enka [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:641.
Case C-504/16, Deister Holding [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:1009.
Case C-247/21, Luxury Trust Automobil GmbH v Finanzamt Österreich [2022] ECLI:EU:C:2022:966.
Internet sources
Retrieved 3. April 2025, from
https://apps.irs.gov/app/understandingTaxes/whys/thm01/les03/media/ws_ans_thm01_les03.pdf
The official website of the Tax administration of Serbia, Retrieved 20. April 2025, from
The official website of the Ministry of Justice of Serbia, Retrieved 20. April 2025, from https://www.mpravde.gov.rs/en/tekst/1701/criminal-matter.php
Stabilization and Association Agreement, Retrieved 20. May 2025, from https://www.mei.gov.rs/upload/documents/sporazumi_sa_eu/ssp_prevod_sa_anexima.pdf
Institution (as an author)
Ministarstvo finansija Republike Srbije. Bilten javnih finansija. Br. 12/220 (2023).