Nacionalna anketa o korišćenju telepsihologije u radu psihologa u Srbiji
Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. Poslednjih decenija, telepsihologija se postepeno razvijala zahvaljujući sve većoj dostupnosti digitalnih tehnologija. Međutim, njena ekspanzija bila je podstaknuta pandemijom i uvođenjem pravila socijalnog distanciranja. Cilj rada bio je da se utvrdi nivo korišćenja računara i interneta u svakodnevnom radu psihologa u Srbiji. Metode. Primenjen je hibridni istraživački dizajn, istraživanje anketnog tipa sa analizom sadržaja. Anketa je imala 70 pitanja koja su se odnosila na korišćenje digitalne tehnologije u praksi psihologa. Nacionalna anketa obuhvatila je 340 diplomiranih psihologa oba pola i svih starosnih kategorija. Učesnici su radili u različitim regionima Srbije, pokrivajući skoro sve delatnosti psihološke prakse, uključujući zdravstvo, prosvetu, industriju, vojsku, i privatnu praksu. Rezultati. Pitanja koja se upućuju psiholozima kada se ispitanik šalje na procenu testovima najčešće su se odnosila na eksploraciju ličnosti, dijagnostičke/neuropsihološke procene i procene vezane za psihoterapiju. U ukupnom uzorku, čak 51% psihologa u Srbiji radilo je on-line terapiju, dok je značajno manje anketiranih (17%) radilo procenu testovima putem interneta. U proceni su najčešće korišćeni testovi domaće proizvodnje, koji su već dugo u upotrebi, a manji broj psihologa koristio je nove psihološke instrumente. Anketa je pokazala da su mlađi psiholozi i psiholozi iz Beograda pozitivnije vrednovali telepsihologiju u poređenju sa starijim psiholozima i psiholozima koji su živeli i radili u drugim sredinama. Terapijska orijentacija anketiranih nije bila značajna za procenu uspešnosti telepsihologije. Zaključak. Rad daje pregled aktuelnog stanja u oblasti procene ličnosti i pokazuje da je korišćenje digitalne tehnologije i telepsihologije u Srbiji razvijenije od profesionalne regulative i edukacije psihologa o tom modalitetu. Za široku primenu telepsihologije u radu psihologa potrebno je da se u nastavni plan i program predmeta na fakultetima i u svetu i kod nas uvedu teme vezane za taj specifični modalitet.
Reference
American Psychological Association. Proposed Revision of Guide-lines for the Practice of Telepsychology [Internet]. Washing-ton, DC: APA; 2024 [accessed on 2025 April 22]. Available from: https://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/telepsycholo gy-revision.pdf
Đurić-Jočić D, Pavlović V, Prica I. The use of telepsychotherapy in the work of psychologists. In: Dukanac V, Đurić M, Živanović D, editors. Proceedings: ALOPS 23 Vulnerabilities of the mo-dern age: the individual and the family. Beograd: Akademija za humani razvoj; 2024. p. 81–93. (Serbian)
Đurić-Jočić D. Psychological assessment of personality and writ-ing of findings. Beograd: Sinapsa edicije; 2023. p. 284. (Serbi-an)
American Psychological Association, Committee on Professional Stand-ards. Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations. Washington: The Association; 1986. p. 24.
Hilty DM, Nesbitt TS, Kuenneth CA, Cruz GM, Hales RE. Rural versus suburban primary care needs, utilization, and satisfac-tion with telepsychiatric consultation. J Rural Health 2007; 23(2): 163–5.
Ruggiero F, Zirone E, Mellace D, Capetti B, Molisso MT, Ferrucci R, et al. How the COVID-19 pandemic reshaped telepsychol-ogy: Insights from an Italian survey. Internet Interv 2024; 38: 100764.
Lin L, Stamm KE, Ferenz K. Wright CV, Bethune S, Conroy J. Relationship between challenges with the use of telehealth and psychologists’ response during the coronavirus pandemic. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2022; 53(6): 596–605.
Wright J, Raiford SE. Essentials of Psychological Tele-assessment. New Jersey: Wiley&Sons; 2020. p. 320.
Parsons TD. Virtual reality for enhanced ecological validity and experimental control in the clinical, affective and social neu-rosciences. Front Hum Neurosci 2015; 9: 660.
Đurić-Jočić D, Pavlović V, Kolundžija Đ. Virtual reality and as-sessment of neurocognitive functions. Engrami 2024; 46(1) 1–13.
Kourtesis P, Collina S, Doumas LAA, MacPherson SE. Validation of the Virtual Reality Everyday Assessment Lab (VR-EAL): An Immersive Virtual Reality Neuropsychological Battery with Enhanced Ecological Validity. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2021; 27(2): 181–96.
Sauzéon H, Arvind Pala P, Larrue F, Wallet G, Déjos M, Zheng X, et al. The use of virtual reality for episodic memory assess-ment: effects of active navigation. Exp Psychol 2011; 59(2): 99–108.
Borgnis F, Baglio F, Pedroli E, Rossetto F, Uccellatore L, Oliveira JAG, et al. Available Virtual Reality-Based Tools for Execu-tive Functions: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 833136. Erratum in: Front Psychol 2022; 13: 995038.
Kirkham R, Kooijman L, Albertella L, Myles D, Yücel M, Rotaru K. Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Methods for Assessing Executive Functioning: Systematic Review. JMIR Serious Games 2024; 12: e50282.
Schönbrodt FD, Asendorpf JB. Virtual social environments as a tool for psychological assessment: Dynamics of interaction with a virtual spouse. Psychol Assess 2011; 23(1): 7–17.
Mühlberger A, Bülthoff HH, Wiedemann G, Pauli P. Virtual reali-ty for the psychophysiological assessment of phobic fear: re-sponses during virtual tunnel driving. Psychol Assess 2007; 19(3): 340–6.
McMinn MR, Buchanan T, Ellens BM, Ryan MK. Technology, professional practice, and ethics: Survey findings and implica-tions. Prof Psychol Res Pract 1999; 30(2): 165–72.
Von Below C, Bergsten J, Midbris T, Philips B, Werbart A. It turned into something else: patients' long-term experiences of transitions to or from telepsychotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychol 2023; 14: 1142233.
Watson JD, Pierce BS, Tyler CM, Donovan EK, Merced K, Mallon M, et al. Barriers and Facilitators to Psychologists' Telepsy-chology Uptake during the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pan-demic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20(8): 5467.
McIntire S, Miller L. Foundations of psychological testing: A practical approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2006. p. 648.
Vodanovich SJ, Piotrowski C. Internet-based instruction: A na-tional survey of psychology faculty. J Instr Psychol 2001; 28(4): 253–6.
Hays SM, McCallum RS. A comparison of the pencil-and-paper and computer-administered Minnesota Multiphasic Personali-ty Inventory–Adolescent. Psychol Sch 2005; 42(6): 605–13.
Đurić-Jočić D, Leposavić I. Human figure drawing as a method of personality and psychopathology assessment. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju; 2018. p. 205. (Serbian)
Barnett JE, Serafim G, Sharara D. Telepsychology: Key recom-mendations for ethical, legal, and effective practice. Pract In-nov 2024; 9(2): 105–18.
Wright CV, Beattie SG, Galper DI, Church AS, Bufka LF, Bra-bender VM, et al. Assessment practices of professional psy-chologists: Results of a national survey. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2017; 48(2): 73–8.
Sablone S, Bellino M, Lagona V, Franco TP, Groicher M, Risola R, et al. Telepsychology revolution in the mental health care de-livery: a global overview of emerging clinical and legal issues. Forensic Sci Res 2024; 9(3): owae008.
