Stanje tvrdog i mekog periimplantnog tkiva u estetskoj regiji gornje vilice posle prezervacije alveolarnog grebena beta-trikalcijum fosfatom sa kolagenom tip I: Studija sa jednogodišnjim periodom praćenja
Sažetak
Uvod/Cilj. Posle ekstrakcije zuba, dimenzionalne promene alveolarnog grebena u estetskoj regiji gornje vilice za posledicu često imaju nedovoljnu količinu kosti za ugradnju zubnih implanata. U vezi sa tim, primenjuju se različiti koštani zamenici sa ciljem očuvanja dimenzija alveolarnog grebena posle ekstrakcije zuba. Cilj rada bio je da se, posle prezervacije alveolarnog grebena beta-trikalcijum fosfatom (TCP) sa kolagenom tip 1, sa barijernom membranom i mukoperiostalnim režnjem i bez nje, ispitaju i uporede klinički ishodi zarastanja posle ugradnje zubnih implanata u estetskoj regiji gornje vilice, tokom jednogodišnjeg perioda praćenja. Metode. Dvadeset zdravih bolesnika podeljeno je u dve grupe: C (beta TCP/kolagen tip 1 bez barijerne membrane i mukoperiostalnog režnja) i C+M (beta TCP/kolagen tip 1 sa barijernom membranom i mukoperiostalnim režnjem). Praćeni su uobičajeni klinički parametri ishoda terapije: implantna stabilnost (analiza rezonantne frekvence), stanje mekih tkiva (indeks krvarenja, plak indeks, širina pripojne mukoze, recesija gingive) i nivo periimplantnog koštanog tkiva na retroalveolarnom radiogramu. Rezultati. U C+M grupi, implantna stabilnost posle 12 nedelja bila je značajno veća u odnosu na primarnu stabilnost. U C+M grupi, širina keratinizovane gingive bila je značajno manja posle 3, 6, 9 i 12 meseci u odnosu na C grupu. Recesija gingive bila je značajno veća u C+M grupi u odnosu na C grupu posle 9 i 12 meseci. Zaključak. Razmatrajući stabilnost mekog i tvrdog periimplantnog tkiva, terapija zubnim implantima može biti uspešna prilikom ugradnje u estetskoj regiji gornje vilice.
Reference
Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23(4): 313–23.
Chen ST, Buser D. Implants in post-extraction sites - a litera-ture update. In: Buser D, Wismeijer D, Belser U, editors. ITI Treatment Guide. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co, Ltd.; 2004.
Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32(2): 212–8.
Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 23 Suppl 5: 1–21.
Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr, Hämmerle CH. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19 Suppl: 12–25.
Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, et al. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2003; 74(7): 990–9.
Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Stappert CF, Stein JM, Hürzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge contour after dif-ferent socket preservation techniques. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35(10): 906–13.
Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restora-tive Dent 2005; 25(2): 113–9.
Misch CE, Silc JT. Socket grafting and alveolar ridge preserva-tion. Dent Today 2008; 27(10): 146–50.
Heberer S, Al-Chawaf B, Hildebrand D, Nelson JJ, Nelson K. His-tomorphometric analysis of extraction sockets augmented with Bio-Oss Collagen after a 6-week healing period: A pro-spective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19(12): 1219–25
Brkovic B, Prasad HS, Konandreas G, Radulovic M, Antunovic D, Sandor GK, et al. Simple preservation of a maxillary extraction socket using betatricalcium phosphate with type I collagen: preliminary clinical and histomorphometric observatuion. J Can Dent Assoc. 2008; 74(6): 523–8.
Darby I, Chen ST, Buser D. Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24 Suppl: 260–71.
Araújo M, Linder E, Lindhe J. Effect of a xenograft on early bone formation in extraction sockets: an experimental study in dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20(1): 1–6.
Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth ex-traction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 Suppl 5: 22–38.
Cordaro L, Torsello F, Miuccio MT, di Torresanto VM, Eliopoulos D. Mandibular bone harvesting for alveolar reconstruction and implant placement: subjective and objective cross-sectional evaluation of donor and recipient site up to 4 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22(11): 1320–6.
Cordaro L, Amade DS, Cordaro M. Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in par-tially edentulous patients prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13(1): 103–11.
Nkenke E, Schultze-Mosgau S, Kloss F, Neukam FW, Radespiel-Troger M. Morbidity of harvesting of chin grafts: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12(5): 495–502.
Sbordone C, Toti P, Guidetti F, Califano L, Bufo P, Sbordone L. Volume changes of autogenous bone after sinus lifting and grafting procedures: a 6-year computerized tomographic fol-low-up. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013; 41(3): 235–41.
von Arx T, Häfliger J, Chappuis V. Neurosensory disturbances following bone harvesting in the symphysis: a prospective clin-ical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16(4): 432–9.
Brkovic BM, Prasad HS, Rohrer MD, Konandreas G, Agrogiannis G, Antunovic D, et al. Beta-tricalcium phosphate/type I colla-gen cones with or without a barrier membrane in human ex-traction socket healing: clinical, histologic, histomorphomet-ric, and immunohistochemical evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16(2): 581–90.
Aludden HC, Mordenfeld A, Hallman M, Dahlin C, Jensen T. Lateral ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss alone or Bio-Oss mixed with particulate autogenous bone graft: a systematic re-view. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46(8): 1030–8.
Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Wüstefeld M, Sager M, Ferrari D, et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19(4): 402–15.
Engler-Hamm D, Cheung WS, Yen A, Stark PC, Griffin T. Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure: a com-parative clinical trial. J Periodontol 2011; 82(3): 377–87.
Barone A, Borgia V, Covani U, Ricci M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. Flap versus flapless procedure for ridge preservation in alveolar ex-traction sockets: a histological evaluation in a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 26(7): 806–13.
Xin R, Leng Y, Chen J, Zhang Q. A comparative study of calci-um phosphate formation on bioceramics in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2005; 26(33): 6477–86.
Zerbo IR, Bronckers AL, de Lange GL, Burger EH, van Beek GJ. Histology of human alveolar bone regeneration with a porous tricalcium phosphate. A report of two cases. Clin Oral Im-plants Res 2001; 12(4): 379–84.
Thompson DM, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS. Comparison of bone grafting materials in human extraction sockets: clinical, histo-logic, and histomorphometric evaluations. Implant Dent 2006; 15(1): 89–96.
Artzi Z, Weinreb M, Givol N, Rohrer MD, Nemcovsky CE, Prasad HS, et al. Biomaterial resorption rate and healing site mor-phology of inorganic bovine bone and beta-tricalcium phos-phate in the canine: a 24-month longitudinal histologic study and morphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 2004 19(3): 357–68.
Zijderveld SA, Zerbo IR, van der Bergh MA, Bruggenkate TC. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using a beta-tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb) alone compared to autogenous bone graft. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20(3): 432–40.
Zou C, Weng W, Deng X, Cheng K, Liu X, Du P, et al. Prepara-tion and characterization of porous -tricalcium phos-phate/collagen composites with an integrated structure. Bio-materials 2005; 26(26): 5276–84.
Farina E, Menditti D, de Maria S, Mezzogiorno A, Esposito V, Laino L, et al. A model of human bone regeneration: morpho-logical, cellular and molecular aspects. J Osseointegration 2009; 1(2): 42–53.
Barone A, Ricci M, Tonelli P, Santini S, Covani U. Tissue changes of extraction sockets in humans. A comparison of spontane-ous healing vs. ridge preservation with secondary soft tissue healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24(11): 1231–7.
Mombelli A, Lang NP. Clinical parameters for the evaluation of dental implants. Periodontol 2000 1994; 4: 81–6.
Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical as-pects and clinical implications. Periodontology 2000 2008; 47(1): 51–66.
Cochran DL, Bosshardt DD, Grize L, Higginbottom FL, Jones AA, Jung RE, et al. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine man-dible. J Periodontol 2009; 80(4): 609–17.
Hartman GA, Cochran DL. initial implant position determines the magnitude of crestal bone remodeling. J Periodontol 2004; 75(4): 572–77.
Peñarrocha MPalomar M, Sanchis JM, Guarinos J, Balaguer J. Ra-diologic study of marginal bone loss arpund 108dental im-plants and its relationshipto smoking, implant location and morphology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19(6): 861–7.
Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH, Kim CS, Moon IS. Effect of mi-crothread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18(4): 465–70.
Canullo L, Goglia G, Iurlaro G, Ianello G. Short-term bone level observations associated with platform switching in immediate-ly placed and restored single maxillary implants: A preliminary report. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22(3): 277–82.
Farronato D, Santoro G, Canullo L, Botticelli D, Maiorana C, Lang NP. Establishment of the epithelial attachment and connec-tive tissue adaptation to implants installed under the concept of “platform switching”: a histologic study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 23(1): 90–4.
Hürzeler M, Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel HC. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: pre-liminary data from a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65(7 Suppl 1): 33–9.
Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a random-ized-controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21(1): 115–21.
Lops D, Bressan E, Parpaiola A, Sbricoli L, Cecchinato D, Romeo E. Soft tissues stability of cad-cam and stock abutments in an-terior regions: 2-year prospective multicentric cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26(12): 1436–42.
Cardaropoli G, Lekholm U, Wennstrom JL. Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: a 1-year pro-spective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17(2): 165–71.
Grunder U. Stability of the mucosal topography around single-tooth implants and adjacent teeth: 1-year results. Int J Perio-dontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20(1): 11–7.
Kim BS, Kim YK, Yun PY, Yi YJ, Lee HJ, Kim SG, Son JS. Evaluation of peri-implant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107(3): e24–8.
Wennström JL, Derks J. Is there a need for keratinized mucosa around implants to maintain health and tissue stability? Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 Suppl 6: 136–46.
Chiu Y, Lee S, Lin Y, Lai Y. Significance of the width of ke-ratinized mucosa on peri-implant health. J Chin Med Assoc 2015; 78(7): 389–94.
Moraschini V, Luz D, Velloso G, Barboza EP. Quality assess-ment of systematic reviews of the significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46(6): 774–81.
Mueller CK, Thorwarth M, Schultze-Mosgau S. Analysis of in-flammatory periimplant lesions during a 12-week period of undisturbed plaque accumulation—a comparison between flapless and flap surgery in the mini-pig. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16(2): 379–85.