Comparison of endovascular microwave ablation and traditional vein stripping for lower extremities varicose veins: a retrospective study

  • Chunfa Cheng The First People's Hospital of Linping District, Department of Vascular Hernia Surgery, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Yifei Yang The First People's Hospital of Linping District, Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Siqi Zhu The First People's Hospital of Linping District, Department of Vascular Hernia Surgery, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Keywords: ablation techniques;, ligation;, lower extremity;, saphenous vein;, treatment outcome;, varicose veins

Abstract


Background/Aim. Varicose veins typically occur in the superficial veins of the lower extremities and are a significant manifestation of chronic venous disease. Patients’ symptoms may vary depending on the pathogenesis, location, and severity of chronic venous disease. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of endovascular microwave ablation (EMA) and conventional high ligation with saphenous vein stripping in managing lower extremity varicose veins. Methods. This retrospective study included 100 patients diagnosed with unilateral varicose veins of the lower extremity. Of these, 50 underwent ultrasound-guided EMA (EMA group), and 50 received traditional vein stripping (traditional group). We assessed and compared operative duration, blood loss during surgery, number of incisions, hospital stay length, and postoperative complications across both groups. Additionally, the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) were evaluated at 6 and 12 months postoperatively to determine treatment effectiveness. Results. All procedures were completed in the 100 cases. The EMA group had considerably reduced operating durations, less blood loss, fewer incisions, and abbreviated hospital stays relative to the traditional group (p < 0.05). Differences in subcutaneous bruising, hematoma formation, and skin burns across the groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05), while differences in local sensory changes and incision infection were not (p > 0.05). The preoperative and postoperative groups showed no substantial difference in VCSS and AVVQ scores (p > 0.05). However, both VCSS and AVVQ scores improved at 6 and 12 months post-surgery (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Clinical evaluation indicates that EMA’s effectiveness is comparable to traditional vein stripping in treating lower extremity varicose veins. EMA also presents safety advantages, suggesting its broader adoption in clinical settings.

 

References

Lu W, Jiang J, Wu H, Chen G, Zhang Q, Yang G. Endovenous Microwave Ablation Versus Laser Ablation for Small Saphe-nous Vein Varicosis. Adv Ther 2024; 41(6): 2342–51.

Tan J, Li J, Bai X, Wang C, Xu W. One Year Follow-Up of Endovascular Microwave Ablation and Concomitant Foam Sclerotherapy in the Treatment of Primary Small Saphenous Vein Insufficiency. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 96: 374–81.

Anuforo A, Evbayekha E, Agwuegbo C, Okafor TL, Antia A, Adabale O, et al. Superficial Venous Disease-An Updated Re-view. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 105: 106–24.

Yang X, Li J, Bai X, Zhou L, Xu W. Endovenous Microwave Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Lower Limb Varicose Veins. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 98: 301–8.

Li Y, Wu W, Li Y, Li J, Sun M. Efficacy and safety of endo-venous microwave ablation versus laser ablation for great sa-phenous vein varicosis: study protocol for a multicentre, ran-domised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12(5): e059213.

Yang L, Wang XP, Su WJ, Zhang Y, Wang Y. Randomized clin-ical trial of endovenous microwave ablation combined with high ligation versus conventional surgery for varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 46(4): 473–9.

Mao J, Zhang C, Wang Z, Gan S, Li K. A retrospective study comparing endovenous laser ablation and microwave ablation for great saphenous varicose veins. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012; 16(7): 873–7.

Fan P, Cong L, Dong J, Han Y, Yang L. Comparison of 5-year outcomes and quality of life between endovenous laser (980 nm) and microwave ablation combined with high ligation for varicose veins. Front Surg 2022; 9: 1022439.

Dong F, Wu Y, Li W, Li X, Zhou J, Wang B, et al. Advance-ments in microwave ablation for tumor treatment and future directions. iScience 2025; 28(4): 112175.

Zhao N, Guo H, Zhang Y, Hu X, He JN, Wang D, et al. Com-parison of endovenous microwave ablation versus radiofre-quency ablation for lower limb varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Ve-nous Lymphat Disord 2024; 12(1): 101662.

Kakkos SK, Gohel M, Baekgaard N, Bauersachs R, Bellmunt-Montoya S, Black SA, Ten et al. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Venous Thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 61(1): 9–82.

Wittens C, Davies AH, Bækgaard N, Broholm R, Cavezzi A, Chastanet S, et al. Editor's Choice - Management of Chronic Venous Disease: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49(6): 678–737. Erratum in: Eur J Vasc Endovasc 2020; 59(3): 495.

Tang TY, Chan KKW, Yap CJQ, Chan SL, Soon SXY, Khoo V, et al. Pilot single-arm study to investigate the efficacy and safety of endovenous Microwave ablations for treatment of varicose veins in Singapore - one year results of the MAES-TRO registry. Phlebology 2022; 37(10): 709–20.

Huang W, Zeng W, Lin XQ, Zhang LF, Wei HJ, He CS. Com-parison of one-year outcomes and quality of life between endovenous microwave ablation and high ligation and strip-ping of the great saphenous vein. Phlebology 2024; 39(2): 108–13.

Subwongcharoen S, Praditphol N, Chitwiset S. Endovenous micro-wave ablation of varicose veins: in vitro, live swine model, and clinical study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009; 19(2): 170–4.

Yang L, Wang X, Wei Z, Zhu C, Liu J, Han Y. The clinical out-comes of endovenous microwave and laser ablation for vari-cose veins: A prospective study. Surgery 2020; 168(5): 909–14.

Tan J, Chen Y, Huang J, Xu W. A systematic review of endove-nous ablation for the treatment of small saphenous varicose veins. Vasa 2023; 52(6): 355–65.

Bachetta A, Cheung S, Moore ER, Nguyen D, Kiely MJ, Whiteley MS. Defining the Parameters for Endovenous Microwave Ab-lation to Achieve Equivalence With Endovenous Laser Abla-tion, Using the Porcine Liver Model. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2024; 58(5): 491–7.

Karnabatidis D, Papageorgiou C, Kitrou P, Spiliopoulos S. One-year duplex ultrasound-assessed closure outcomes of percutaneous endovenous microwave ablation for the treatment of varicose veins of the lower limbs. Vascular 2023; 31(5): 1011–6.

Li X, Feng Y, Liu Y, Zhang F. Varicose veins of the lower ex-tremity secondary to tricuspid regurgitation. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 60: 477.e1–77.e6.

Broderick C, Watson L, Armon MP. Thrombolytic strategies ver-sus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 1(1): CD002783.

Wang W, Li Q, Wen L. An Unusual Cause of Left Lower Ex-tremity Varicose Veins. Gastroenterology 2022; 162(4): e9–11.

Gloviczki P, Lawrence PF, Wasan SM, Meissner MH, Almeida J, Brown KR, et al. The 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery, Amer-ican Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Socie-ty clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part I. Duplex Scanning and Treatment of Superficial Truncal Reflux: Endorsed by the So-ciety for Vascular Medicine and the International Union of Phlebology. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2023; 11(2): 231–61.e6. Erratum in: J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2024; 12(2): 101719.

Gloviczki P, Lawrence PF, Wasan SM, Meissner MH, Almeida J, Brown KR, et al. The 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery, Amer-ican Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Socie-ty clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part II: Endorsed by the Socie-ty of Interventional Radiology and the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2024; 12(1): 101670. Erratum in: J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2024; 12(5): 101923.

Farah MH, Nayfeh T, Urtecho M, Hasan B, Amin M, Sen I, et al. A systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Sur-gery, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society guidelines on the management of vari-cose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022; 10(5): 1155–71.

Barros FS, Storino J, Cardoso da Silva NA, Fernandes FF, Silva MB, Bassetti Soares A. A comprehensive ultrasound approach to lower limb varicose veins and abdominal-pelvic connec-tions. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2024; 12(3): 101851.

Wang JC, Gu J, Li Y, Ma Q, Feng J, Lu S. Transforming growth factor-β1 and inducible nitric oxide synthase signaling were involved in effects of prostaglandin E on progression of lower limb varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2021; 9(6): 1535–44.

El-Sharkawy YH. Development of a custom optical imaging system for non-invasive monitoring and delineation of lower limb varicose veins using hyperspectral imaging and quantita-tive phase analysis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2023; 44: 103808.

Adler C, Mousa A, Rhee A, Patel MD. Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremity: Doppler US Evaluation Protocols, Pat-terns, and Pitfalls. Radiographics 2022; 42(7): 2184–200.

Published
2025/09/26
Section
Original Paper