Forms of sharenting as a modern social phenomenon of children’s portrait
Abstract
The paper analyzes the parents’ contemporary practice of posting virtual content about their children on social networks and online platforms in general. Sharing content about a child on social networks and online without restrictions is an approach that fully recognizes the parents’ right and freedom to shape the visibility of their child, as well as the child’s right to privacy. Even limiting access to one’s own profile to a certain close circle of people does not guarantee absolute protection of the child’s well-being. Namely, the danger of closed profiles, to which only “friends” or close people, relatives, godparents of the child have access, is reflected in the fact that these people can further forward, or download, such content. Initially, the concept of sharenting was associated with sharing content about children for altruistic motives, and then for exclusively personal, entertaining, non-profit motives of parents, and the further “evolution” of this phenomenon was in the direction of parents sharing children-related content for business motives. Sharing content about children for the sake of parents’ entertainment motives is the leading reason why content about children is shared online.
References
Carr, J., Hilton, Z. (2011). Combating child abuse images on the Internet International perspectives. In: J. Davidson, P. Gottschalk (eds.). Internet Child Abuse, 52–78. New York.
Choudhry, S. (2009). Parental Responsibility and Corporal Punishment. In: R. Probert, S. Gilmore, J. Herring (eds.). Responsible Parents and Parental Responsibility. Oxford.
Donovan, S. (2020). “Sharenting”: The Forgotten Children of the GDPR. PHRG, Peace Human Rights Governance, 4 (1), 35–59.
Filipović, J. (2011). Methodological Aspects of Children’s Consumer Behaviour Research. Marketing, 42 (2), 97–105. [In Serbian]
Filipović, J. (2016). Analysis of the children’s motivation for the internet use and their activities in the online environment. Teme – časopis za društvene nauke, 40 (2), 823–838.
Fineman, M. (2023). Honey, I Monetized the Kids: Commercial Sharenting and Protecting the Rights of Consumers and the Internet’s Child Stars. Georgetown Law Journal, 111 (4), 848–890.
Goshadze, K. (2020). Legal Implications of “Sharenting”. Law and World, 6 (15), 19–26.
Haley, K. (2020). Sharenting and the (Potential) Right to Be Forgotten. Indiana Law Journal, vol. 95 (3), 1005–1020.
Hamming, K. (2020). A Dangerous Inheritance: A Child’s Digital Identity. Seattle University Law Review, vol. 43 (3), 1033–1063.
Iskul, A., Joamets, K. (2021). Child Right to Privacy and Social Media – Personal Information Oversharing Parents. Baltic Journal of Law and Politics, 14 (2), 101–122.
Johnston, C. (2020). Sharing of Children’s Health Data by Health Professionals and Parents – A Consideration of Legal Duties. Indian Journal of Law and Technology, 16 (1), 48–70.
Kovačević, Lј. (2021). Establishing an employment relationship. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. [In Serbian]
Novaković, U. (2025) Sharenting – the parents’ right or the abuse of the child’s rights?. Sociološki pregled, 59 (1), 346–371. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg59-53981.
Pacht Friedman, J. (2022). The Monetization of Childhood: How Child Social Media Stars Are Unprotected from Exploitation in the United States. Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice, 28 (2), 362–388.
Stanivuković, M., Đajić, S. (2022). The Right of the parent to return to its country of origin in the light of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and the European Convention on the protection of Human Rights. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70 (1), 123–158. [In Serbian]
Yates, C. (2023). Influencing “Kidfluencing”: Protecting Children by Limiting the Right to Profit from “Sharenting”. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 25 (4), 845–870.
Copyright (c) 2026 Sociološki pregled
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.