Флексибилност тржишта рада као детерминанта степена развоја одабраних земаља ЕУ
Sažetak
Са циљем евалуације утицаја интегрисања флексибилних облика рада на економски развој посматраних земаља ЕУ, аутори су истраживали и систематски анализирали везу између критеријума варијабле флексибилности тржишта рада и предикторске варијабле бруто домаћег производа по становнику. Аутори су спровели истраживање на бази званичних података ЕУ ЛФС добијених на основу пројекта РПП 35/2020-ЛФС који су одобрили Европска комисија и Еуростат. У раду ће бити анализиран узорак од 321.208 испитаника у периоду од 2008. до 2018. године у Бугарској, Грчкој, Хрватској и Румунији. У истраживачком делу рада аутори су користили линеарну корелациону анализу, израчунали су коефицијент корелације и коефицијент детерминације, придружена је статистичка значајност, а за потребе статистичке анализе аутори су користили и статистичке програме СПСС и Статистика. На основу опсежне анализе података из одабраних земаља чланица Европске уније, аутор је добио резултате који указују на повећање динамике тржишта рада и раст бруто домаћег производа по становнику у 75% посматраних земаља, што аутори имплицирају већом флексибилношћу тржишта рада.
Reference
Ayouba, K., Le Gallo, J., & Vallone, A. (2020). Beyond GDP: an analysis of the socio-economic diversity of European regions. Applied Economics, 52 (9), 1010-1029.
Barbieri, P., & Cutuli, G. (2016). Employment Protection Legislation, Labour Market Dualism, and Inequality in Europe. European Sociological Review, 32 (4), 501–516.
Blažević Dević, I. (2023). The effect of workforce flexibility on the economic development of EU countries. Faculty of Economics in Osijek (in Croatian), University Josip Juraj Strossmayer in Osijek, Osijek.
Bergeaud, A., Cette, G., & Lecat, R. (2019). The Circular Relationship Between Productivity Growth and Real Interest Rates. Banque de France, Working Paper, 734, Banque de France.
Boeri, T. (2010). Institutional Reforms and Dualism in European Labour Markets. Handbook of Labour Economics, Elsevier, 1 (4), 1173-1236.
Dall’erba, S. (2005). Distribution of regional income and regional funds in Europe 1989–1999: An exploratory spatial data analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 39 (1), 121–148.
Díaz Dapena, A., Rubiera-Morollon, F., & Paredes, D. (2019). New Approach to Economic Convergence in the EU: A Multilevel Analysis from the Spatial Effects Perspective. International Regional Science Review, 42 (3-4), 335-367.
Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2005). The consequences of labour market flexibility: Panel evidence based on survey data. European Economic Review, 49 (5), 1225-1259.
Ertman, A. (2011). Differences in Flexibility of Labour Markets in OECD Countries - The TOPSIS Method (in Polish). Oeconomia Copernicana, 2 (3), 43–64.
Ertur, C., & Koch, W. (2006). Regional disparities in the European Union and the enlargement process: an exploratory spatial data analysis, 1995–2000. The Annals of Regional Science, 40 (4), 723–765.
EU Labour Force Survey (2020). Database User Guide. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/1978984/6037342/EULFS-Database-UserGuide.pdf
Eurostat (2020). Real GDP per capita. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_08_10/default/table?lang=en
Galik, A., Bąk, M., Bałandynowicz-Panfil, K., & Cirella, G.T. (2022). Evaluating Labour Market Flexibility Using the TOPSIS Method. Sustainable Industrial Relations. Sustainability, 14 (1), 526.
Gebel, M., & Giesecke, J. (2016). Does Deregulation Help? The Impact of Employment Protection Reforms on Youths’ Unemployment and Temporary Employment Risks in Europe. European Sociological Review, 32 (4), 486–500.
Grekousis, G., & Gialis, S. (2018). More Flexible Yet Less Developed? Spatio‑Temporal Analysis of Labour Flexibilization and Gross Domestic Product in Crisis‑Hit European Union Regions. Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 143 (2), 505–524.
Jadamus-Hacura, M., & Melich-Iwanek, K. (2015). Flexibility of modern labor markets (in Polish). Studia Ekonomiczne, 220, 36–57.
Keune, M., & Jepsen, M. (2007). Not balanced and hardly new: the European Commission's quest for flexicurity. Brussels: ETUI-REHS.
Le Gallo, J., & Ertur, C. (2003). Exploratory spatial data analysis of the distribution of regional per capita GDP in Europe, 1980–1995. Papers in Regional Science, 82 (2), 175-201.
Noelke, C., & Avendano, M. (2015). Who Suffers During Recessions? Economic Downturns, Job Loss, and Cardiovascular Disease in Older Americans. American Journal of Epidemiology, 182 (10), 873–882.
Sahnoun, M., & Abdennadher, C. (2019). Labour Market Institutions and Performance Economic Within Trial Labour Market Models: Flexibility, Rigidity, and Flexicurity. The Review of Black Political Economy, 46 (2), 99–129.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.