Role of Lung Ultrasound in Determining the Endpoint of Fluid Therapy in Patients With Septic Shock

  • Walaa Salah Eldeen Mohammed Critical Care Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine ,Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt
  • Tarek Elsayed Gouda Critical Care Unit , Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine ,Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5583-1598
  • Afaf Abdel Hafez Critical Care Unit , Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine ,Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1894-8150
  • Mostafa Elmansy Diagnostic Radiology Department , Faculty of Medicine ,Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9812-6418
  • Samar Abd El-Hamid Mousa Critical Care Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine ,Mansoura University , Mansoura, Egypt http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4875-1287
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/scriptamed57-65172
Keywords: Fluid therapy, Shock, septic, Ultrasonography

Abstract


Background/Aim: Fluid resuscitation in septic shock is essential, but determining the optimal volume remains challenging. This research aimed to evaluate the role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in assessment of endpoint of fluid therapy in septic shock.

Methods: This prospective observational research comprised 60 adults with septic shock admitted to critical care unit between May 2024 and December 2025. Fluid responsiveness was assessed by left ventricular outflow tract velocity–time integral (LVOT VTI) variation during passive leg raise; ≥ 10 % increase defined responders. LUS was performed using simplified, quantitative eight zone and qualitative eight zone protocols. Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, along with inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI), was also performed.

Results: Thirty-five patients (58.3 %) were fluid responders and 25 (41.7 %) non-responders. Non-responders exhibited lower IVCCI and higher prevalence of diastolic dysfunction, particularly grades II–III. The simplified LUS score (cut-off ≥ 11) showed excellent discrimination of fluid unresponsiveness [AUC 0.913 (95 % CI 0.844 – 0.983)]. The quantitative 8-zone score (cut-off ≥ 4) had good performance [AUC 0.834 (95 % CI 0.732 – 0.942)], while the qualitative protocol had the highest specificity for discriminating fluid unresponsiveness (sensitivity 76 %, specificity 85.5 %). Combining LUS with echocardiography improved identification of patients unlikely to benefit from further fluid.

Conclusion: LUS, particularly the simplified protocol, may serve as a bedside tool to predict fluid unresponsiveness and guide resuscitation endpoints in septic shock. Combined with echocardiography, it supports a multimodal, individualised approach that minimises overload risk.

References

Paphawin S, Theerawit P, Junhasavasdikul D, Sutherasan Y. The accuracy of dynamic parameters for prediction of fluid responsiveness in elderly patients with septic shock. Int J Gen Med. 2025;18:2333-42. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S517511.

Wang J, Blake LM, Orozco N, Fiorini K, McChesney C, Slessarev M, et al. Dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness to guide resuscitation in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Explor. 2025;7(9):e1303. doi:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001303.

Vetrugno L, Biasucci DG, Deana C, Spadaro S, Lombardi FA, Longhini F, et al. Lung ultrasound and supine chest X-ray use in modern adult intensive care: mapping 30 years of advancement (1993–2023). Ultrasound J. 2024;16(1):7. doi:10.1186/s13089-023-00351-4.

Melo RH, Santos MHCD, Ramos FJDS. Beyond fluid responsiveness: the concept of fluid tolerance and its potential implication in hemodynamic management. Crit Care Sci. 2023;35(2):226-9. doi:10.5935/2965-2774.20230012-en.

Rusu DM, Siriopol I, Grigoras I, Blaj M, Ciumanghel AI, Siriopol D, et al. Lung ultrasound guided fluid management protocol for the critically ill patient: study protocol for a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):236. doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3345-0.

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-10. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

Parker CW, Kolimas AM, Kotini-Shah P. Velocity-time integral: a bedside echocardiography technique finding a place in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2022;63(3):382-8. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.04.012.

Innocenti F, Savinelli C, Coppa A, Tassinari I, Pini R. Integrated ultrasonographic approach to evaluate fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):9159. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36077-5.

Wang J, Zhou D, Gao Y, Wu Z, Wang X, Lv C. Effect of VTI-LVOT variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(47):e22702. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000022702.

Nagueh SF, Sanborn DY, Oh JK, Anderson B, Billick K, Derumeaux G, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography and for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction diagnosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2025;38(7):537-69. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2025.03.011.

Cavefors O, Ljung Faxén U, Bech-Hanssen O, Lundin S, Ricksten SE, Redfors B, et al. Isolated diastolic dysfunction is associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2023;76:154290. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154290.

S SK, Desai N, Gona OJ, K VK, B M. Impact of updated 2016 ASE/EACVI vis-à-vis 2009 ASE recommendation on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;29(1):31-43. doi:10.4250/jcvi.2020.0117.

Rajpal M, Talwar V, Krishna B, Mustafi SM. Assessment of extravascular lung water using lung ultrasound in critically ill patients. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024;28(2):165-9. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24635.

Pirompanich P, Karakitsos D, Alharthy A, Gillman LM, Blaivas M, Buchanan BM, et al. Evaluating extravascular lung water in sepsis. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018;22(9):650-5. doi:10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_256_18.

Levy Adatto N, Preisler Y, Shetrit A, Shepshelovich D, Hershkoviz R, Isakov O. Rapid 8-zone lung ultrasound protocol is comparable to a full 12-zone protocol. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;41(7):1677-87. doi:10.1002/jum.15849.

Zou T, Yin W, Li Y, Deng L, Zhou R, Wang X, et al. Hemodynamics in shock patients assessed by critical care ultrasound. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:5175393. doi:10.1155/2020/5175393.

Kamath S, Hammad Altaq H, Abdo T. Management of sepsis and septic shock. Microorganisms. 2023;11(9):2231. doi:10.3390/microorganisms11092231.

Airapetian N, Maizel J, Alyamani O, Mahjoub Y, Lorne E, Levrard M, et al. Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness? Crit Care. 2015;19:400. doi:10.1186/s13054-015-1100-9.

Xu LY, Tu GW, Cang J, Hou JY, Yu Y, Luo Z, et al. End-expiratory occlusion test predicts fluid responsiveness. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(14):315. doi:10.21037/atm.2019.06.58.

Horejsek J, Balík M, Kunstýř J, Michálek P, Brožek T, Kopecký P, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using combined occlusion tests. J Clin Med. 2023;12(7):2569. doi:10.3390/jcm12072569.

Robinson S, Ring L, Oxborough D, Harkness A, Bennett S, Rana B, et al. The assessment of left ventricular diastolic function. Echo Res Pract. 2024;11(1):16. doi:10.1186/s44156-024-00051-2.

Zhang H, Jiang J, Dai M, Liang Y, Li N, Gao Y. Predictive accuracy of changes in the inferior vena cava diameter. PLoS One. 2025;20(5):e0310462. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0310462.

Orso D, Paoli I, Piani T, Cilenti FL, Cristiani L, Guglielmo N. Accuracy of ultrasonographic measurements of inferior vena cava. J Intensive Care Med. 2020;35(4):354-63. doi:10.1177/0885066617752308.

Mayr U, Lukas M, Habenicht L, Wiessner J, Heilmaier M, Ulrich J, et al. B-lines scores derived from lung ultrasound. J Intensive Care Med. 2022;37(1):21-31. doi:10.1177/0885066620967655.

Enghard P, Rademacher S, Nee J, Hasper D, Engert U, Jörres A, et al. Simplified lung ultrasound protocol shows excellent prediction of extravascular lung water in ventilated intensive care patients. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):36. doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0756-5.

Saad SI, Behairymb AS, Mahdy EW. Role of lung ultrasound, CVP and inferior vena cava diameter. Benha J Appl Sci. 2022;7(10):33-40. doi: 10.21608/bjas.2022.284646.

Atmowihardjo LN, Schippers JR, Haaksma ME, Smit MR, Bogaard HJ, Heunks L, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound to determine PiCCO-derived extravascular lung water. Ultrasound J. 2023;15(1):40. doi:10.1186/s13089-023-00340-7.

Anile A, Russo J, Castiglione G, Volpicelli G. A simplified lung ultrasound approach. Crit Ultrasound J. 2017;9(1):13. doi:10.1186/s13089-017-0068-x.

Published
2026/04/29
Issue
Vol. 57 No. 2 (2026): Mar-Apr
Section
Original article
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).