CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES IN THE BANKING RISK MANAGEMENT

  • Nenad Milojević

Abstract


Risk management is one of the crucial parts of today’s business banks management. Global economic crisis in the last decade has strongly influence that risk management is having increased importance in the total banking management. Credit risk is still most dominant risk in the banks worldwide. Similar situation is also in the Republic of Serbia. Liquidity, market, operational and other risks are also having increased importance in today’s banking. Still, typical dominant risk of average commercial bank is credit risk. High level of non-performing loans is one of the especially important credit risk contemporary challenges. Banks, regulatory bodies and other involved institutions are intensively working on the solutions for this topic. Methods for the risk management are experiencing significant changes and progress in the recent years. Inevitablyconnected banking topic with previous is capital managementprogress.In this article current situation in the banking risk management will be analysed. It will be shown in which direction risk management will develop. It will be also analysed actual situation in the banking capital management. Experiences from the Republic of Serbia as well as worldwide banking experiences will be taken into consider. The article will outline recommendations for further risk management progress.

References

Alexander, C. and Sheedy, E., The Professional Risk Managers’ Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Current Theory and Best Practices, PRMIA Publications, Wilmington, 2004

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel III overview table: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision reforms - Basel III, https://www.bis.org/bcbs/basel3/b3summarytable.pdf

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems, June 2011

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools, January 2013

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Finalising post-crisis reforms: an update, November 2015

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Implementation of Basel standards - A report to G20 Leaders on implementation of the Basel III regulatory reforms, November 2015

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards, July 1988, updated to April 1998

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards – A revised Framework, June 2006

Catarineu-Rabell, E., Jackson, P., Tsomocos, D.P., Procyclicality and the new Basel Accord – Banks’ Choice of Loan Rating System, Bank of England, Working Paper no. 181, London, 2003

Cecchetti S. G, and Kharroubi, E., Reassessing the Impact of Finance on Growth, Bank for International Settlements, BIS Working Papers No. 381, 2012

Decision on Capital Adequacy of Banks, RS Official Gazette, No 46/2011, 6/2013 and 51/2014

Decision on Information and Data to be Submitted to the National Bank of Serbia for the Purpose of Drawing up and Updating the Resolution Plan for Bank and Banking Group, RS Official Gazette, No 78/2015

Decision on Recovery Plans of Banks and Banking Groups, RS Official Gazette, No 71/2015

Decision on the Minimum Requirement for Capital and Eligible Liabilities of a Bank, RS Official Gazette, No 30/2015

Financial Stability Board, Adequacy of loss-absorbing capacity of global systemically important banks in resolution - Consultative Document, November 2014

Fitch Ratings, http://www.fitchratings.com/

Government of Republic of Serbia, NPL Resolution Strategy, http://www.mfin.gov.rs/UserFiles/File/strategija%20krediti/2%20NPL%20Strategija%20%28eng%29.pdf

International Monetary Fund, Financial Soundness Indicators, http://data.imf.org/?sk=9F855EAE-C765-405E-9C9A-A9DC2C1FEE47

International Monetary Fund, World Development Indicators: Financial access, stability and efficiency, wdi.worldbank.org/table/5.5#

Kashyap K., and Stein, J., Cyclical implications of the Basel II capital standards, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Economic Perspectives,1Q/2004.

König, P. J., Liquidity Requirements: A Double-Edged Sword, International Journal of Central Banking, Volume 11, Number 4 December 2015, Pages 129-168, Economic Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

Masschelein, N., Monitoring pro-cyclicality under the capital requirements directive: preliminary concepts for developing a framework, National Bank of Belgium, Working Paper No. 120 - October 2007.

Milojevic N., Efekti primene Bazelskih standarda u Srbiji, Čugura print i Univerzitet Edukons, Beograd, 2011.

Milojević, N., Basel II and Forecasting Implementation Effects, Industrija (Industry), Vol.36, No. 1/2008, 51-65, Economic Institute, Beograd

Milojević, N., Perspectives of Banks Capital Requirement Changes Due to the Basel Standards Implementation, Business Economics, Year V, No. 2, Vol. IX, Faculty of Business in Service, Novi Sad, 2011, p. 171-191

Moody's Investors Service, http://www.moodys.com/

National Bank of Serbia - Bank Supervision Department, Banking Sector in Serbia - Third Quarter Report 2015, Beograd

National Bank of Serbia, http://www.nbs.rs

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, http://www.standardandpoors.com/

Stulz, R., Risk-Taking and Risk Management by Banks, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Volume 27, Issue 1, Winter 2015, Pages 8–18, Wiley-Blackwell

The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Official Journal of the European Union

Published
2017/04/12
Section
Original Scientific Paper