Nuclear medicine hybrid imaging (SPECT/CT) in distinguishing the presence of a hepatic hemangioma – single center study
Abstract
Introduction
Hepatic hemangioma (HH) is the most common benign liver tumor, and the second most frequent tumor in the liver after hepatic metastasis. Clinicians often encounter а diagnostic dilemma of whether the detected hepatic lesion/mass is а benign or malignant tumor. The SPECT/CT hybrid technique will be beneficial for the investigation of this type of HH since it can precisely identify the hepatic lesions. It is possible to avoid other more invasive procedures like biopsy by using the non-invasive and highly specific technique of scintigraphy with marked red cells using 99mTc via SPECT.
The aim of this study was to reevaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the nuclear medicine method for confirmation or exclusion of benign hemangioma of the liver based on a series of cases at our department and briefly review of the literature.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 107 patients, 62 females (57.94%) and 45 males (42,05%) with mean age 50.05±11.92 years, referred to the Nuclear Medicine Department for 99mTc-RBC scintigraphy of the liver to conclude or exclude the presence of HH, in the period 2019 to 2020.
Results Hepatic scintigraphy located the hemangiomas mostly in the right hepatic lobe. The size of the lesion varied from to 6-140 mm (46.04 ± 27.1); 13 hemangiomas were described as giant.
SPECT-CT confirmed HH in 1 patient that was negative on ultrasound, besides 30/87 (34,48%) patients who were described as positive on US and turned out to be negative on the scintigraphic method. In 53 (60,92%) patients, positive matching of the US images and hybrid SPECT/CT imaging for HH was found.
Most of the patients had benign referral diagnosis, while 12 of them had confirmed malignant diagnosis in whom (n=8, 66,67%) were confirmed free of hepatic metastasis and SPECT-CT detected HH, while in 4 patients who were described as positive for HH on the CT scan, the scintigraphic method excluded HH and further evaluation of the hepatic lesion was needed.
Conclusion
Hepatic hemangiomas require a careful diagnosis to differentiate from other focal hepatic lesions, co-occurring diagnoses are also possible. Differentiating between HH and hepatic metastatic disease is a typical clinical difficulty when the problem is present in staging or monitoring patients with oncological disease.
References
1. Valdés Mas M, Ortiz Sánchez ML, Rodrigo Agudo JL, et al. Hemangioma hepáticogiganteasociado a síndrome de Kasabach-Merrit. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2008;100(8):511–513.
2. Zheng JG, Yao ZM, Shu CY, Zhang Y, Zhang X. Role of SPECT/CT in diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomas. World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Sep 14;11(34):5336-41. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i34.5336.
3. H. Van Malstein, G. Maleux, D. Monbaliu, et al.Giant liver hemangioma: The role of female sex hormones and treatment Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 23 (2011), pp. 438-443
4. A, Tasev V, Bonev S, Dimitrova V. Liver hemangiomas-surgical point of view. Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2014 ;( 2):63-8
5. Bischof DA, Choti MA. Differential diagnoses and diagnostic troubleshooting of upper abdominal masses. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2013 Jun;9(6):399-400. PMID: 23935549; PMCID: PMC3736799.
6. Heiken JP. Distinguishing benign from malignant liver tumours. Cancer Imaging. 2007;7(spec no A):S1–S14.
7. Szurowska E, Nowicki T, Izycka-Swieszewska E, et al. Is hepatotropic contrast enhanced MR a more effective method in differential diagnosis of hemangioma than multi-phase CT and unenhanced MR? BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:43
8. Jang HJ, Kim TK, Lim HK, Park SJ, Sim JS, Kim HY, Lee JH. Hepatic hemangioma: atypical appearances on CT, MR imaging, and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:135–141.
9. Zheng WW, Zhou KR, Chen ZW, Shen JZ, Chen CZ, Zhang SJ. Characterization of focal hepatic lesions with SPIO-enhanced MRI. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:82–86.
10. Terriff BA, Gibney RG, Scudamore CH. Fatality from fine-needle aspiration biopsy of a hepatic hemangioma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:203–204.
11.Taavitsainen M, Airaksinen T, Kreula J, Paivansalo M. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of liver hemangioma. Acta Radiol. 1990;31:69–71.
12. Yavuz, H. S. , Öner Tamam, M. , Ozcevik, H. , Yavuz, A. , Mülazımoğlu, M. "KaraciğerHemanjiomuTanısında Tc-99m İşaretliEritrositSintigrafisinin SPECT/BT ileDeğerlendirilmesi". İstanbul GelişimÜniversitesiSağlıkBilimleriDergisi 2023; (19): 98-109
13. Bajenaru N, Balaban V, Săvulescu F, Campeanu I, Patrascu T. Hepatic hemangioma -review-. J Med Life. 2015;8 Spec Issue(Spec Issue):4-11.
14. Toro A, Mahfouz AE, Ardiri A, Malaguarnera M, Malaguarnera G, Loria F, Bertino G, Di Carlo I. What is changing in indications and treatment of hepatic hemangiomas. A review. Ann Hepatol. 2014; 13(4):327-39
15. Murakami T, Tsurusaki M. Hypervascular benign and malignant liver tumors that require differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma: key points of imaging diagnosis. Liver Cancer. 2014 May;3(2):85-96. doi: 10.1159/000343864. PMID: 24944999; PMCID: PMC4057794.
16. Engel MA, Marks DS, Sandler MA, Shetty P. Differentiation of focal intrahepatic lesions with 99mTc-red blood cell imaging. Radiology. 1983 Mar;146(3):777-82. doi: 10.1148/radiology.146.3.6298859. PMID: 6298859.
17. Jolepalem P, Grigore C, Palka JC. Scintigraphic evaluation of a suspected cavernous hemangioma. J Nucl Med Technol. 2012 Dec;40(4):290-2, 12A. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.112.114280. Epub 2012 Oct 9. PMID: 23048209.
18. Salati, Sajad, Al-Kadi, Azzam. Hepatic haemangioma: a Case Report and Review of Literature. East Cent. Afr. J. surg, 2015; (20): 110-122
19. Royal HD, Brown ML, Drum DE, Nagle CE, Sylvester JM, Ziessman HA. Procedure guideline for hepatic and splenic imaging 3.0. SOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE PROCEDURE GUIDELINES MANUAL.2003 August.
20. Nakanuma Y. Non neoplastic nodular lesions in the liver. Pathol.Int. 1995;45:703–714
21. El-Desouki M, Mohamadiyeh M, Al-Rashed R, Othman S, Malabary T, Al-Mofleh I. TC-99m-labeled red blood cell scintigraphy in the investigation of patients with hepatic cavernous hemangioma. Saudi J Gastroenterol 1999;5:27-31
22. Yilmaz M , Derebek E , Dicle O , Degirmenci B, Sayit E 2 , Çapa G2, Bekis R , Durak H. Evaluation of hepatic hemangioma with technetium-99m RBC scintigraphy: A review of 74 cases with liver masses.Turk J Gastroenterol 2000; 11: 61-68
23. Schillaci, O., Danieli, R., Manni, C. et al. Technetium-99m-labelled red blood cell imaging in the diagnosis of hepatic haemangiomas: the role of SPECT/CT with a hybrid camera. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31, 1011–1015 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-004-1518-9
24. Swiętaszczyk C, Pilecki SE. To what extent can diverse types of liver lesions mimic hemangiomas? A retrospective quantitative analysis of masses found to be positive in SPECT/CT with labeled blood cells - a preliminary report. Pol J Radiol. 2013 Oct;78(4):21-6. doi: 10.12659/PJR.889225. Epub 2013 Nov 19. PMID: 24511318; PMCID: PMC3908504.
