Network Societies
Neoliberal Materials for an Exploratory Theory
Abstract
The paper examines different notions of knowledge in an information society and argues that Manuel Castells’ theory of the network society should be positioned between the concepts of postindustrial and knowledge society. Castells explicitly relies on Daniel Bell’s conservative definition and discards Fritz Machlup’s understanding of knowledge. This puts Castells in a difficult position when it comes to evaluation of the network society’s social structure. Neoliberal anti-scientific and anti-Enlightenment definition of knowledge questions the fundamental split between the Net and the Self, the tension between information and social networks. Mundane, ephemeral knowledge of the common people is at the center of neoliberal perspective of market and culture, in contrast with the concept of the network society. The neoliberal knowledge problem is examined on three levels of Castells’ proposed struggle between information and social networks: power of identity vs communication power, mass self-communication vs hypertext meta-language; and culture of real virtuality vs the public mind.
References
Becker, G. & Posner, R. (2009). Uncommon Sense: Economic Insights, from Marriage to Terrorism. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press.
Bell, D. (1976). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books.
Bell, D. (1983). A reply to Weizenbaum. In Dertouzos, M. & Moses, J. (eds.), The Computer Age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bell, D. (1999). The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books.
Bonefeld, W. (2017). Strong State and the Free Economy. London: Rowman and Littlefield
Bourdieu: (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu: (2000) Acts of resistance: Against the new myths of our time. Cambridge: Polity.
Carnoy, M. & Castells, M. (2001). Globalization, the knowledge society, and the Network State: Poulantzas at the millennium. Global Networks, 1 (1), 1–18.
Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51 (1), 5–24.
Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford. Oxford University Press
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Cambridge: Polity.
Castells, M. (2010a) The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2010b) The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2010c). End of millenium. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2019). Rupture: the crisis of liberal democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
Castells, M. (2021). From cities to networks: power rules. Journal of Classical Sociology, 21 (3-4), 260-262.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 32, 3-7.
Drucker: (1957/1996). Landmarks of tomorrow. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Drucker: (1969). The age of discontinuity. London: Heinemann.
Drucker: (1989). The new realities. New York: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (2008). Birth of biopolitics. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Friedman, M. (1951). Neoliberalism and its Prospects. Farmand, 17, 89˗93.
Friedman M. & Friedman, R. (1980). Free to Choose. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hayek, F. (1990). New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas. London: Routledge.
Hayek, F. (1992). The Fatal Conceit. London: Routledge.
Hayek, F. (1998). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 3: The Political Order of a Free People. London: Routledge.
Hayek, F. (2010). Studies on the Abuse and Decline of Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. (2011). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Jameson, F. (1992). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. London: Verso.
Kellner, D. (1995). Media Culture: Cultural studies, identity and politics between the modern and the postmodern. London: Routledge.
Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
Lyotard, J.F. (1984). The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Machlup, F. (1980). Knowledge: its creation, distribution, and economic significance. Volume 1, Knowledge and Knowledge Production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Machlup, F. (1982). Optimum utilization of knowledge. Society, 20 (1), 8-10.
Machlup, F. (1983). Semantic quirks in studies of information. In Machlup, F. & Mansfield, U. (eds.), The study of information: interdisciplinary messages. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Mayer- Schönberger, V. and Range, T. (2018). Reinventing capitalism in the age of big data. New York: Basic Books.
Mirowski: and Nik˗Khah, E. (2017). The Knowledge We Have Lost in Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mises, L. (1949/1996). Human action: a treatise on economics. San Francisco: Fox & Wilkes.
Nawrocki, M. (2024). After the epistemological turn: A framework for studying populism as a knowledge phenomenon. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 26(2), 444-465.
Penezić, S. & Vasiljević, J. (2022). Društvena getoizacija kao tačka preseka savremenih veza arhitekture i komunikacija. Politički život, br. 23, 111-131.
Preston, P. (2001). Reshaping Communications. London: SAGE.
Pentland, A. (2015). Social physics: how social networks can make us smarter. New York: Penguin books.
Ropke, W. (1956). The place of economics among the sciences. In Sennholz, M. (ed.), On freedom and free enterprise: essays in honor of Ludwig von Mises. New Jersey: D. van Nostrand.
Roth, A. (2015). Who gets what, and why: the hidden world of matchmaing and market design. New York: HarperCollins.
Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.
Simon, H. (1983). Reason in human affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Simon, H. (1997). Administrative behavior. New York: New Press.
Stiegler, B. (2015). States of Shock: Stupidity and Knowledge in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Polity.
Sunstein, C. & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: causes and cures. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 202-227.
Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happines. London: Yale University Press.
Turner, F. (2006). From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Van Dijck, J. (2013). Cultures of connectivity: a critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webster, F. (2014). Theories of the information society. London: Routledge.
Williams, R. (2003). Television: Technology and Cultural Form. London: Routledge.
Copyright
Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.
Licensing
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original.
Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in CM: Communication and Media and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Self-archiving policy
Authors are permitted to deposit author’s publisher's version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author's personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), at any time after publication.
Full bibliographic information (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages) about the original publication must be provided and links must be made to the article's DOI and the license.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in the published works do not express the views of the Editors and the Editorial Staff. The authors take legal and moral responsibility for the ideas expressed in the articles. Publisher shall have no liability in the event of issuance of any claims for damages. The Publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.