MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING BASED MORPHOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF GLENOID

  • Dr. Aashay Kekatpure Professor Orthopedics DMMC Nagpur , Director Apex Speciality Clinics Nagpur
  • Dr. Megha Manoj Resident DMIMS Sawangi
  • Dr. Shivali Kashikar Prof . Department Of Radiology DMIMS Sawangi Wardha
  • Dr. Aditya Kekatpure Associate Professor DMMC Nagpur
Keywords: glenoid, magnetic resonance imaging, arthroplasty, central India

Abstract


This study aimed to evaluate the morphological variations of the glenoid in an Asian population and compare them with those in the Western population. A retrospective study of 100 patients who presented with shoulder pain between Jan. 2018 and Jan. 2019 was done. The glenoid height, width and version were measured on coronal and axial images. The overall mean version was found to be an anteversion of 0.40 ± 3.6. The average glenoid widths in males and females were 29 mm and 25.2 mm respectively, whereas the overall average glenoid width was 27 ± 3.2 mm. The average glenoid heights in males and females were 35.7 mm and 32.4 mm respectively, whereas the overall average glenoid height was 34 ± 2.5 mm. The glenoid dimensions in the Asian population were found to be slightly less than the ones in the Western population. This difference has to be considered when choosing a prosthesis for shoulder arthroplasty.

Author Biography

Dr. Megha Manoj , Resident DMIMS Sawangi

JR3 DMIMS Sawangi Meghe Wardha 

References

Amy CY, Chester LW, Lit CH, Lam CW, Kevin WK, Bong WS, Cheung WW. Are the current size options of glenoid baseplates for reverse shoulder arthroplasty sufficient for our local population?. Journal of orthopaedics, trauma and rehabilitation 2016;21(1):30-4. [CrossRef]

Barco R, Savvidou OD, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH. Complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1(3):72-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Churchill RS, Brems JJ, Kotschi H. Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10(4):327-32. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Drake GN, O’Connor DP, Edwards TB. Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(6):1526-33. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

El-Din WA, Ali MH. A morphometric study of the patterns and variations of the acromion and glenoid cavity of the scapulae in Egyptian population. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9(8):AC08-11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Huri G, Familiari F, Salari N, Petersen SA, Doral MN, McFarland EG. Prosthetic design of reverse shoulder arthroplasty contributes to scapular notching and instability. World J Orthop 2016;7(11):738-45. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Mathews S, Burkhard M, Serrano N, Link K, Häusler M, Frater N, et al. Glenoid morphology in light of anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a dissection-and 3D-CT-based study in male and female body donors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18(1): 9 [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Meshram P, Pawaskar A, Kekatpure A. 3D CT scan-based study of glenoid morphology in Indian population: Clinical relevance in design of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2020; 11(Suppl 4): S604-S609 [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Shah F, Marks N, Jara JF, Pérez RF, Beltran J. Shoulder Measurements using CT: What the orthopedic surgeon wants to know. ESSR Annual Scientific Meeting 2013 [CrossRef]

Singh A, Agarwal P, Gupta R. A morphological and morphometric study of glenoid fossa of scapula and its implication in shoulder arthroplasty. Int J Anat Radiol Surg. 2019;8(3): 6-9. [CrossRef]

Published
2024/07/03
Section
Original article