**Predvidljivost i ograničenje ugovorne štete u rimskom pravu**
Ključne reči:
Predvidljivost, Ograničenje odgovornosti, Ugovorna šteta, Rimsko pravo
Sažetak
Ovaj članak proučava ograničenje odgovornosti za ugovornu štetu u rimskom pravu kako bi ispitao da li je koncept predvidljivosti u ugovornoj šteti formiran u rimskom pravu i kakav je njegov uticaj na razvoj ograničenja odgovornosti za ugovornu štetu u savremenom pravu. Zaključuje se da su rimski pravnici, iako nije postojalo opšte pravilo, u određenim kontekstima raspravljali o ograničenju ugovorne štete i da je postojao nejasan nagoveštaj predvidljive štete kao osnove za ograničenje naknade štete. Rimsko pravo postavilo je temelje za pravično ograničenje ugovorne štete, što je postalo inspiracija za razvoj predvidljivosti i ograničenja odgovornosti u ugovornom pravu modernog doba.
Reference
1. Katy Barnett, “Reflections on the Principles of Remoteness in Contract in Comparative Law”, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 37, 2023, 1-30.
2. Edijs Brants, “Role of Foreseeability in Imposition of Civil Liability”, Rīga Stradiņš University, 2(20), 2021, 268–286.
3. Cornelis Jan de Bruijn, “Latent defect or excessive price? Exploring early modern legal approach to remedying defects in goods exchanged for money”, [PhD-Thesis - Research and graduation internal, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam], 2018. Retrieved June 12, 2024, from https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/69434145/complete+dissertation.pdf.
4. Alma Diamond, “Remoteness and the limitation of contractual damages”, [LLM-thesis-Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University], 2016. Retrieved April 28, 2024, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/188224834.pdf.
5. Paul du Plessis, Borkowski’s Textbook On Roman Law, Oxford 2020.
6. Franco Ferrari, “Comparative Ruminations on the Foreseeability of Damages in Contract Law”, Louisiana Law Review, 53, 1993, 1257-1269.
7. Bruce Woodward Frier, (2021). A Casebook on the Roman Law of Contracts, Chapter IV: Sale: A Contract Created Through Informal Agreement, Oxford 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2024, from http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/cdonahue/courses/rlaw/mats/Frier_007%20Chapter%204%20Casebook%20on%20the%20Roman%20Law%20of%20Contracts.pdf.
8. Jan Hallebeek, “The ignorant seller´s liability for latent defects: One regula or various sets of rules?” In J. W. Cairns, & P. J. du Plessis (Eds.), The creation of the ius commune. From Casus to regula, 2010, 175-217.
9. David Ibbetson, “How the Romans Did for Us: Ancient Roots of the Tort of Negligence”, University of New South Wales Law Journal, 26(2), 2003, 475.
10. Helen Scott, “The history of foreseeability”. Current Legal Problems, 72(1), 2019, 287–314.
11. Samuel Parsons Scott, The Civil Law - Translated from the Original Latin 5-6. Clark, 2001.
12. Alan Watson, The Digest of Justinian 2, Philadelphia, 2001.
13. Johannes Wilhelmus Wessels, The Law of Contract in South Africa II, Johannesburg 1937.
14. Reinhard Zimmerman, The law of obligations : Roman foundations of the civilian tradition, Cape Town 1990.
2. Edijs Brants, “Role of Foreseeability in Imposition of Civil Liability”, Rīga Stradiņš University, 2(20), 2021, 268–286.
3. Cornelis Jan de Bruijn, “Latent defect or excessive price? Exploring early modern legal approach to remedying defects in goods exchanged for money”, [PhD-Thesis - Research and graduation internal, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam], 2018. Retrieved June 12, 2024, from https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/69434145/complete+dissertation.pdf.
4. Alma Diamond, “Remoteness and the limitation of contractual damages”, [LLM-thesis-Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University], 2016. Retrieved April 28, 2024, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/188224834.pdf.
5. Paul du Plessis, Borkowski’s Textbook On Roman Law, Oxford 2020.
6. Franco Ferrari, “Comparative Ruminations on the Foreseeability of Damages in Contract Law”, Louisiana Law Review, 53, 1993, 1257-1269.
7. Bruce Woodward Frier, (2021). A Casebook on the Roman Law of Contracts, Chapter IV: Sale: A Contract Created Through Informal Agreement, Oxford 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2024, from http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/cdonahue/courses/rlaw/mats/Frier_007%20Chapter%204%20Casebook%20on%20the%20Roman%20Law%20of%20Contracts.pdf.
8. Jan Hallebeek, “The ignorant seller´s liability for latent defects: One regula or various sets of rules?” In J. W. Cairns, & P. J. du Plessis (Eds.), The creation of the ius commune. From Casus to regula, 2010, 175-217.
9. David Ibbetson, “How the Romans Did for Us: Ancient Roots of the Tort of Negligence”, University of New South Wales Law Journal, 26(2), 2003, 475.
10. Helen Scott, “The history of foreseeability”. Current Legal Problems, 72(1), 2019, 287–314.
11. Samuel Parsons Scott, The Civil Law - Translated from the Original Latin 5-6. Clark, 2001.
12. Alan Watson, The Digest of Justinian 2, Philadelphia, 2001.
13. Johannes Wilhelmus Wessels, The Law of Contract in South Africa II, Johannesburg 1937.
14. Reinhard Zimmerman, The law of obligations : Roman foundations of the civilian tradition, Cape Town 1990.
Objavljeno
2025/11/26
Rubrika
Originalni naučni rad