Psychosocial characteristics and motivational factors in woman seeking cosmetic breast augmentation surgery
Abstract
Background/Aim. There are various opinions regarding the factors motivating women to undergo breast augmentation. The aim of this study was to estimate motivation for augmentation mammaplasty (AM), self-esteem and body image perception in breast augmentation patients. Methods. This prospective study involved AM patients operated in the Clinical Center of Vojvodina during a 3-year period. A total of 45 patients responded to our package of questionnaires designed to assess motivation for surgery, self-esteem level and body image perception. Those patients were compared to the control group of women who did not want to change their breast size, and who were similar in their age, social status and education level. Our package of questionnaires included a general questionnaire, Photographic Figure Rating Scale (PFRS) and Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale. Results. Differences in marital status, educational level, habitation and employment status were statistically insignificant, but there was a significantly lower body mass index (BMI) in the operated women. Considering motives for surgery, a few factors were distinguished: desire to feel more feminine (82.2%), confident (75.5%) and attractive (73.3%), to feel less shy with men (64.4%), to improve their sex life (46.5%), teasing history (42.2%) and easier to find a partner (11.1%) and job (2.2%). Both groups demonstrated a high self-esteem level, but in the the AM group results were lower than in the control group. The mean current self-rating by the PFRS in the group AM was lower than in the control group (4.28 ± 1.3 vs 5.12 ± 1.23, respectively) and this coincided with lower BMI in the AM group. The women in the AM group had chosen significantly smaller body size as maximally attractive, and had chosen a narrower attractive body size range than the women in the control group. Conclusion. Preoperative evaluation of patients’ motives for surgery can help surgeons to exclude woman with unrealistic expectations and different psychological problems.
References
The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. !5th an-nual Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics 2011. Available from: http/ /www.surgery.org/media/statistics
Sarwer DB, Pertschuk M J, Wadden, TA, Whitaker LA. Psycho-logical investigations in cosmetic surgery: A look back and a look ahead. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101(4): 1136−42.
Cash TF, Melnyk SE, Hrabosky JI. The assessment of body im-age investment: An extensive revision of the Appearance Schemas Inventory. Int J Eat Disord 2004; 35(3): 305–16.
Sarwer DB, LaRossa D, Bartlett SP, Low DW, Bucky LP, Whitaker LA. Body Image Concerns of Breast Augmentation Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112(1): 83−90.
Henderson-King D, Henderson-King E. Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: Scale development and validation. Body Image: An Int J Res 2005; 2(2): 137−49.
Brown A, Furnham A, Glanville L, Swami V. Factors that affect the likelihood of undergoing cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2007; 27(5): 501–8.
Rubin LR, Klassen A, Cano SJ, Pusic AL. Motivations for breast surgery: a quantitative comparison study of breast reconstruction, augmentation and reduction patients. Breast J 2009; 15(6) 666−7.
Crerand CE, Infield AL, Sarwer DB. Psychological considera-tions in cosmetic breast augmentation. Plast Surg Nurs 2007; 27(3): 146−54.
Solvi AS, Foss K, von Soest T, Roald HE, Skolleborg KC, Holte A. Motivational factors and psychological processes in cosmetic breast augmentation surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63(4): 673−80.
Bazner J. Attitudes About Cosmetic Surgery: Gender and Body Experience. GVSU McNair Scholars J 2002; 6(1): 11−6.
Alagoz MS, Basrerzi AD, Uysal AC, Tüzer V, Unlü RE, Sensöz O, et al. The Psychiatric View of Patients of Aesthetic Surgery: Self-Esteem, Body Image and Eating Attitude. Aesth Plast Surg 2003; 27(5): 345−8.
Sarwer DB. Psychological consideration in cosmetic surgery. In: Glodwyn RM, Cohen MN, editors. The Unfavorable Result in Plastic Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia. Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 14−23.
Crerand CE, Franklin ME, Sarwer DB. Body dysmorphic dis-order and cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118(7): 167e−80e.
Kellett S, Clarke S, McGill P. Outcome from psychological as-sessment regarding recommendation for cosmetic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61(5): 512−7.
Borah G, Rankin M, Wey P. Psychological complication in 281 plastic surgery practices. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104(5): 1241−9.
Swami V, Salem N, Furnham A, Tovee MJ. Initial examination of the validity and reliability of the female photographic figure rating scale for body image assessment. Personal Individ Dif-feren 2008; 44: 1752−61.
Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Revised ed. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1989.
Bruck JC, Klenschmidt A, Ottomann C. Invreased self-confidence and decreased sexual discomfort after subpectoral mammap-lasty. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2011; 43(2): 112−8. (German)
Mazzocchi M, Dessi LA, Iodice P, Saggini R, Scuderi N. A study of postural changes after breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36(3): 570−7.
McGregor FC. Social, psychological and cultural dimensions of cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery. Aesth Plast Surg 1989; 13(1): 1−8.
Simis KJ, Verhulst FC, Koot HM. Body image, psychosocial functional, and personality: How different are adolescents and young adults applying for plastic surgery? J Child Psychol Psy-chiatry 2001; 42(5): 669−78.
Sarwer DB, Crerand CE. Body image and cosmetic medical treatments. Body Image 2004; 1(1): 99−111.
Didie ER, Sarwer DB. Factors that influence the decision to undergo cosmetic breast augmentation surgery. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003; 12(3): 241−53.
Javo IM, Sorlie T. Psychosocial predictors of an interest in cos-metic surgery:a population-based study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124(6): 2142−8.
von Soest T, Kvalem IL, Skolleborg KC, Roald HE. Psycholosocial factors predicting the motivation to undergo cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117(1): 51−62; discussion 63−4.
Honigman R, Phillips KA, Castle DJ. A review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113(4): 1229−37.
Birtchnell S, Whitfield P, Lacey JH. Motivation factors in women requesting augmentation and reduction mammaplasty. J Psy-chosom Res 1990; 34(5): 509−14.
Javo IM, Sorlie T. Psychosocial characteristics of young norwe-gian women interested in liposuction, breast augmentation, rhinoplasty, and abdominoplasty:a population –based study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125(5): 1536−43.
Levine JC, Anderson RC. Preoperative assessment of eating dis-orders in plastic surgery patients. Plast Surg Nurs 2009; 29(1): 60−3.
Burk J, Zelen SL, Terino EO. More than skin deep: a self-consistency approach to the psychology of cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76(2): 270−80.
Ozgur F, Tuncali D Gursu G. Life satisfaction, self-esteem and body image:a psychosocial evaluation of aesthetic an recon-structive surgery candidates. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1998; 22(6): 412−9.
Shim C, Thoma A, McCahe RE, Antony M. Measuring Outcomes in Aesthetic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111(1): 469−80.
Crerand CE, Cash TF, Whitaker LA. Cosmetic surgery of the face. In: Sarwer DB, Pruzinsky T, Cash TF, Goldwyn RM, Persing JA, Whitaker LA, editors. Psychological Aspects of Recon-structive and Cosmetic Plastic Surgery: Empirical, Clinical, and Ethical Issues. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 233−50.
Sarwer DB, Didie ER, Gibbons LM. Cosmetic surgery of the body. In: Sarwer DB, Pruzinsky T, Cash TF, Goldwyn RM, Persing JA, Whitaker LA, editors. Psychological Aspects of Reconstructive and Cosmetic Plastic Surgery: Empirical, Clinical, and Ethical Issues. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 251−66.