Isolation with rubber dam: knowledge, training, and attitudes of final year dental students
Abstract
Background/Aim. Good undergraduate education is necessary to overcome the reluctance of dentists to use the rubber dam (RD). The aim of the study was to assess de-ntal students’ knowledge, training skills, attitudes, and opinions concerning the use of RD in order to isolate an operation field. Methods. A 34-item original questio-nnaire was distributed to 130 final-year students of the Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade. The questions were divided into four segments: general info-rmation, RD-related knowledge and training skills, opi-nions and attitudes regarding the use of RD, and opinions on the intended future use of RD. Results. All students confirmed that they had theoretical lessons about RD and that its advantages were pointed out. During practical courses, 34% of students observed RD placement and 10% of them placed RD on their own or with assistance. Most (88%) of the students did not feel capable of using RD on their own. Less than half of the students (38%) believed that adequate isolation of the operating field is po-ssible without RD. Sixty-four percent of students consi-dered that RD was not uncomfortable for the patients. More than half of the students were willing to use RD in their future practice. Almost all of them planned to gain additional postgraduate training with RD. Conclusion. Students have solid theoretical knowledge about RD; they are aware of its importance and have a positive attitude toward RD use. However, their practical training and skills are poor and insufficient for independent RD use in order to isolate an operation field.
References
1. Marshall K. Rubber dam. Br Dent J 1998; 184(5): 218‒9.
2. Mackay R, St Peter C. Rubber dam purpose. Br Dent J 2008; 205(6): 295‒6.
3. Oyster DK. Rubber dam use. J Am Dent Assoc 2016; 147(5): 316.
4. Cochran MA, Miller CH, Sheldrake MA. The efficacy of the rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms during dental treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 119(1): 141‒4.
5. Mackay JR. Rubber dam in endodontics. Br Dent J 2002; 193(3): 126.
6. Ahmad IA. Rubber dam usage for endodontic treatment: a review. Int Endod J 2009; 42(11): 963‒72.
7. Al-Amad SH, Awad MA, Edher FM, Shahramian K, Omran TA. The effect of rubber dam on atmospheric bacterial aerosols during restorative dentistry. J Infect Public Health 2017; 10(2): 195‒200.
8. Wang Y, Li C, Yuan H, Wong MC, Zou J, Shi Z, et al. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 9: CD009858.
9. Keys W, Carson SJ. Rubber dam may increase the survival time of dental restorations. Evid Based Dent 2017; 18(1): 19‒20.
10. Webber J. Endodontics: No rubber dam, no root canal. Br Dent J 2017; 222(3): 142.
11. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006; 39(12): 921‒30.
12. American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Clinical Affairs Committee - Pulp Therapy subcommittee; American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2008; 30(7 Suppl): 170‒4.
13. Whitworth JM, Seccombe GV, Shoker K, Steele JG. Use of rubber dam and irrigant selection in UK general dental practice. Int Endod J 2000; 33(5): 435‒41.
14. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners. Int Endod J 2007; 40(6): 427‒32.
15. Madarati AA. Why dentists don't use rubber dam during endodontics and how to promote its usage? BMC Oral Health 2016; 16: 24.
16. Ahmed HM, Cohen S, Lévy G, Steier L, Bukiet F. Rubber dam application in endodontic practice: an update on critical educational and ethical dilemmas. Aust Dent J 2014; 59(4): 457‒63.
17. Hill EE, Rubel BS. Do dental educators need to improve their approach to teaching rubber dam use? J Dent Educ 2008; 72(10): 1177‒81.
18. Gilbert GH, Riley JL, Eleazer PD, Benjamin PL, Funkhouser E, National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. Discordance between presumed standard of care and actual clinical practice: the example of rubber dam use during root canal treatment in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. BMJ Open 2015; 5(12): e009779.
19. Kapitan M, Sustova Z. The use of rubber dam among Czech dental practitioners. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2011; 54(4): 144‒8.
20. Joynt RB, Davis EL, Schreier PH. Rubber dam usage among practicing dentists. Oper Dent 1989; 14(4): 176‒81.
21. Koshy S, Chandler NP. Use of rubber dam and its association with other endodontic procedures in New Zealand. N Z Dent J 2002; 98(431): 12‒6.
22. Mala S, Lynch CD, Burke FM, Dummer PM. Attitudes of final year dental students to the use of rubber dam. Int Endod J 2009; 42(7): 632‒8.
23. Ryan W, O'Connel A. The attitudes of undergraduate dental students to the use of the rubber dam. J Ir Dent Assoc 2007; 53(2): 87‒91.
24. Imbery TA, Greene KE, Carrico CK. Dental dam and isovac usage: factors influencing dental students' decisions on isolation techniques. J Dent Educ 2019; 83(4): 474‒82.
25. Tanalp J, Kayatas M, Can ED, Kayahan MB, Timur T. Evaluation of senior dental students' general attitude towards the use of rubber dam: a survey among two dental schools. ScientificWorld Journal 2014; 2014: 290101.
26. Marshall K, Page J. The use of rubber dam in the UK. A survey. Br Dent J 1990; 169(9): 286‒91.
27. Gilbert GH, Litaker MS, Pihlstrom DJ, Amundson CW, Gordan VV, DPBRN Collaborative Group. Rubber dam use during routine operative dentistry procedures: findings from the Dental PBRN. Oper Dent 2010; 35(5): 491‒9.
28. Imbery TA, Carrico CK. Dental dam utilization by dentists in an intramural faculty practice. Clin Exp Dent Res 2019; 5(4): 365‒76.
29. Al-Sabri FA, Elmarakby AM, Hassan AM. Attitude and knowledge of isolation in operative field among undergraduate dental students. Eur J Dent 2017; 11(1): 83‒8.
30. Reid J, Callis P, Patterson CJ. Rubber dam in clinical practice. London: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1991.
31. Kuo SC, Chen YL. Accidental swallowing of an endodontic file. Int Endod J 2008; 41(7): 617‒22.
32. Susini G, Pommel L, Camps J. Accidental ingestion and aspiration of root canal instruments and other dental foreign bodies in a French population. Int Endod J 2007; 40(8): 585‒9.
33. Stewardson DA, McHugh ES. Patients' attitudes to rubber dam. Int Endod J 2002; 35(10): 812‒9.
34. Kapitan M, Hodacova L, Jagelska J, Kaplan J, Ivancakova R, Sustova Z. The attitude of Czech dental patients to the use of rubber dam. Health Expect 2015; 18(5): 1282‒90.
35. Madarati A, Abid S, Tamimi F, Ezzi A, Sammani A, Shaar MBAA, et al. Dental-dam for infection control and patient safety during clinical endodontic treatment: preferences of dental patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15(9): 2012.
36. McKay A, Farman M, Rodd H, Zaitoun H. Pediatric dental patients' attitudes to rubber dam. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013; 38(2): 139‒41.