Snalaženje u muškom domenu: rod, rad i nejednakosti na indijskim platformama za dostavu hrane
Sažetak
U sve većem diskursu o radu u gig ekonomiji, iskustvo žena koje rade na gig pozicijama ostaje nedovoljno istraženo. Presek specifične organizacije rada na platformama za gig rad i postojećih rodno obojenih društvenih normi proizvodi različite ishode u različitim kontekstima. Ovaj rad istražuje kako radnice u dostavi hrane ulaze, opstaju i snalaze se na indijskim platformama za dostavu hrane – sektoru koji se u velikoj meri smatra „muškim“ domenom. Koristeći kvalitativni istraživački pristup, ova studija se oslanja na 20 polustrukturiranih intervjua sa ženama i muškarcima koji rade na glavnim platformama za dostavu hrane u Tiruvanantapuramu, u Indiji. Rezultati pokazuju kako se rodne društvene norme odražavaju i reprodukuju u politikama i praksama platformi za dostavu hrane. Ovakva dinamika ograničava učešće žena, oblikuje njihovo radno vreme i na kraju povećava razliku u zaradi između muškaraca i žena na platformama za dostavu hrane. U ovom radu naglašena je potreba za politikama i praksama koje promovišu pozitivnu diskriminaciju kako bi se povećalo učešće ženske radne snage i osigurala ravnopravna zarada, i istovremeno negovali dostojanstveni i inkluzivni uslovi rada u okviru gig ekonomije.
Reference
Abedi, F. H., Noorbala, F., Saeedi, Z. (2010). Stereotypical beliefs about sex role-typed occupations and the mediating effect of exposure to counterstereotypic examples in Iranian students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1425–1428. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.300
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and Religion. Rand McNally.
Bhandare, N. (2022). ‘Why an increase in women’s workforce numbers might not be good news’, IndiaSpend. Available at: https://www.indiaspend.com/womenwork/why-an--increase-in-womens-workforce-numbers-might-not-be-good-news-826138 (Last visited on 23 August 2023).
Chaudhary, R. (2020). ‘The future of work for women workers’, Project report. New Delhi: IWWAGE. Available at: https://iwwage.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/IWWAGE-Gig-Economy-Report.pdf.
Creswell, J. W., Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five approaches. Sage.
Dalzell, T., Victor, T. (2014). The concise new Partridge dictionary of slang and unconventional. London: Routledge.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W. (2012). Social Role theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 458–476. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49
Ghosh, A., Ramachandran, R., Mubashira Z. (2021). ‘An exploratory study: women workers in the gig economy in India’, Institute of Social Studies Trust. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.10963.91683.
Griesbach, K., Reich, A., Elliott-Negri, L., Milkman, R. (2019) . Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5, 237802311987004. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119870041
Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The Lack of Fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269–298.
Heilman, M. E. (1997). Sex discrimination and the Affirmative Action Remedy: The role of sex stereotypes. Women in Corporate Management, 5–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5610-3_2
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (4), 657–674. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00234
Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., Martell, R. F. (1995). Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 10 (6), 237–252.
ILO (2021). World Employment and Social Outlook: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. (WESO). Available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/-dgreports/-dcomm/-publ/documents/publication/ wcms_771749.pdf
Jabagi, N., Croteau, A. M., Audebrand, L., Marsan, J. (2019). Gig-workers’ motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 34.10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0255.
Katz, H. C. (1997). Telecommunications: Restructuring work and employment relations worldwide. Cornell University Press.
Miller, L., Budd, J. (1999). The development of Occupational Sex‐role stereotypes, occupational preferences and academic subject preferences in children at ages 8, 12 and 16. Educational Psychology, 19 (1), 17–35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341990190102
Rosenblat, A., Luke, S. (2016). Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers. International Journal of Communication 10, 3758–84.
Sexton, D. L., Bowman-Upton, N. (1990). Female and male entrepreneurs: Psychological characteristics and their role in gender-related discrimination. Journal of Business Venturing, 5 (1), 29–36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(90)90024-n
Shapiro, A. (2018). Between autonomy and control: Strategies of arbitrage in the “on-demand” economy. New Media & Society, 20 (8), 2954–2971.
Sharma, Y. Seth (2022). ‘Despite policy support, labour participation by women still low’, The Economic Times. Available at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/jobs/despite-policy-support-labour-participation-by-women-still-low/articleshow/90061223.cms?from=mdr (Last visited on 23 August 2023).
Steinmetz, K. (2015). Labor lawsuits filed against HomeJoy, Postmates, Caviar. Available at: http:// time.com/3751745/postmates-homejoy-try-caviar-lawsuits/
Uber Technologies (2014, November 10). Uber partner agreement. Retrieved from http:// www.dropbox.com/s/rlp3o4oylh0zt4n/Partner Agreement November 10 2014.pdf
Wood, W., Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55–123. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7
Woodcock, J., Graham, M. (2020). The Gig Economy: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
World Bank (2019). World Development Report 2019: The Changing Nature of Work. Available at: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/816281518818814423/pdf/2019-WDRReport.pdf
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2026 Sociološki pregled
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 međunarodnom licencom.