ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP ACROSS THE SURGICAL PATHWAY
Abstract
Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) help ensure antibiotics are used effectively to treat infections, reduce side effects, and slow the spread of antibiotic resistance. Improving collaboration among healthcare professionals is the most important way to strengthen ASPs in hospitals.
So far, most ASPs have focused on medical specialities and applied the same approach to all hospital settings. In surgery, it is essential to understand the local cultural and contextual factors that shape prescribing habits so targeted strategies can be developed. Antibiotic stewardship in surgery must be integrated with strict infection prevention and source control, as all three work together to improve patient care.
Effective ASPs usually combine persuasive strategies, which educate and influence prescribers, with restrictive ones, which limit certain practices. While clinical guidelines turn evidence into practice and improve the quality of care, they do not always fit local realities. Adapting them into locally relevant tools, such as protocols, bundles, checklists, and posters, can boost acceptance and adherence. Actively involving prescribers in developing these tools increases the likelihood of meaningful change. Clearly defining responsibilities for specific actions within these protocols helps ensure they are followed.
References
Sartelli M, Labricciosa FM, Barbadoro P, Pagani L, Ansaloni L, Brink AJ, et al. The Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery: defining a model for antimicrobial stewardship—results from an international cross-sectional survey. World J Emerg Surg. 2017;12:34. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0145-2.
Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance National/International Network Group (WARNING) Collaborators. Ten golden rules for optimal antibiotic use in hospital settings: the WARNING call to action. World J Emerg Surg. 2023;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00518-3.
Allegranzi B, Zayed B, Bischoff P, Kubilay NZ, de Jonge S, de Vries F, et al. New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(12):e288-e303. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30402-9.
Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S, Kubilay NZ, Zayed B, Gomes SM, et al. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(12):e276-87. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30398-X.
Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):784-91. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.
Ban KA, Minei JP, Laronga C, Harbrecht BG, Jensen EH, Fry DE, et al. American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: surgical site infection guidelines, 2016 Update. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Jan;224(1):59-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.029.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Surgical site infections: prevention and treatment. NICE guideline [NG125]. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng125. Last accessed: 18 November 2024.
Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Greene L, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(6):605-27. doi: 10.1086/676022.
Sartelli M, Bartoli S, Borghi F, Busani S, Carsetti A, Catena F, et al. Implementation strategies for preventing healthcare-associated infections across the surgical pathway: an Italian multisociety document. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(3):521. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030521.
Schreiber PW, Sax H, Wolfensberger A, Clack L, Kuster SP; Swissnoso. The preventable proportion of healthcare-associated infections 2005-2016: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control HospEpidemiol. 2018;39(11):1277-95. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.183.
Sartelli M, Labricciosa FM, Coccolini F, Coimbra R, Abu-Zidan FM, Ansaloni L, et al. It is time to define an organizational model for the prevention and management of infections along the surgical pathway: a worldwide cross-sectional survey. World J Emerg Surg. 2022;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00420-4.
Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(3):195-283. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120568.
Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Labricciosa FM, Al Omari AH, Bains L, Baraket O, et al. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a proposal for a global evidence-based bundle. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024;13(1):100. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010100.
Ierano C, Thursky K, Marshall C, Koning S, James R, Johnson S, et al. Appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practices in Australia. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(11):e1915003. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15003.
Sartelli M, Duane TM, Catena F, Tessier JM, Coccolini F, Kao LS, et al. Antimicrobial stewardship: a call to action for surgeons. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016;17(6):625-31. doi: 10.1089/sur.2016.187.
Sawyer RG, Claridge JA, Nathens AB, Rotstein OD, Duane TM, Evans HL, et al. Trial of short-course antimicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):1996-2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411162.
Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery collaborators group. A global declaration on appropriate use of antimicrobial agents across the surgical pathway. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017;18(8):846-53. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.219.
Davey P, Brown E, Charani E, Fenelon L, Gould IM, Holmes A, et al. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(4):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub3.
Goff DA, Kullar R, Goldstein EJC, Gilchrist M, Nathwani D, Cheng AC, et al. A global call from five countries to collaborate in antibiotic stewardship: united we succeed, divided we might fail. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(2):e56-e63. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30386-3.
Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan JE Jr, Gerding DN, Weinstein RA, Burke JP et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 ;44(2):159-77. doi: 10.1086/510393.
Charani E, Tarrant C, Moorthy K, Sevdalis N, Brennan L, Holmes AH. Understanding antibiotic decision making in surgery-a qualitative analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(10):752-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.03.013.
Charani E, Ahmad R, Rawson TM, Castro-Sanchèz E, Tarrant C, Holmes AH. The differences in antibiotic decision-making between acute surgical and acute medical teams: an ethnographic study of culture and team dynamics. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(1):12-20. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy844.
Brink AJ, Messina AP, Feldman C, Richards GA, van den Bergh D; Netcare Antimicrobial Stewardship Study Alliance. From guidelines to practice: a pharmacist-driven prospective audit and feedback improvement model for peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in 34 South African hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(4):1227-34. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw523.
Elligsen M, Walker SA, Simor A, Daneman N. Prospective audit and feedback of antimicrobial stewardship in critical care: program implementation, experience, and challenges. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2012;65(1):31-6. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v65i1.1101.
Chan AJ, Tsang ME, Langford BJ, Nisenbaum R, Wan M, Downing MA. Evaluating a pilot, structured, face-to-face, antimicrobial stewardship, prospective audit-and-feedback program in emergency general surgery service in a community hospital. Antimicrob Steward HealthcEpidemiol. 2023;3(1):e96. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.168.
Sartelli M. Leveraging the synergy between antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control in fighting antimicrobial resistance. Sanamed. 2021;16(3):231-3. doi: 10.24125/sanamed.v16i3.524.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sanamed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal Sanamed is published under an Open Access license. All its content is available free of charge. Users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search the full text of articles, as well as establish HTML links to them, without having to seek the consent of the author or publisher.
The right to use content without consent does not release the users from the obligation to give the credit to the journal and its content in a manner described under CC BY.