Glucose-to-Platelet Ratio as a Biochemical Indicator of Metabolic–Coagulation Imbalance and Mortality Risk in Critically Ill Patients with Ischemic Stroke: A MIMIC-IV Cohort Study

GPR as a Biochemical Marker of Metabolic–Coagulation Imbalance in Ischemic Stroke

  • Jie Peng Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University
  • Xingzhan Zhang Department of Intensive Care Unit, The People's Hospital Medical Group of Xiangzhou
  • Huanhuan Wu Department of Intensive Care Unit, The People's Hospital Medical Group of Xiangzhou
  • Hongzhi Chen Department of Intensive Care Unit, The People's Hospital Medical Group of Xiangzhou
  • Jianbin Guan Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University
  • Zhanguo Liu Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University
  • Xingxing Liu Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Keywords: Ischemic stroke, Glucose-to-platelet ratio, Biochemical marker, Metabolic–coagulation imbalance, Mortality

Abstract


Background: Early identification of high-risk patients with ischemic stroke in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains challenging. Biochemical markers reflecting the interplay between metabolic stress and coagulation–inflammatory pathways may provide improved prognostic value. The glucose-to-platelet ratio (GPR), a composite index derived from routine laboratory parameters, has emerged as a potential indicator of systemic metabolic–coagulation imbalance; however, its prognostic significance in critically ill ischemic stroke patients has not been fully elucidated.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the MIMIC-IV database. Adult patients with ischemic stroke undergoing their first ICU admission and with a length of stay 24 hours were included (n = 3686). After excluding patients with missing exposure data, 3536 individuals were analyzed. GPR was calculated as the ratio of the first measured blood glucose (mg/dL) to platelet count (×10⁹/L) within 24 hours of ICU admission. Participants were categorized into quartiles according to GPR levels. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, and restricted cubic spline analyses were employed to evaluate the association between GPR and 28- and 90-day all-cause mortality.

Results: In fully adjusted models, each unit increase in GPR was independently associated with increased risks of 28-day mortality (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03–1.21; P=0.009) and 90-day mortality (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01–1.17; P=0.002). Compared with the lowest quartile, patients in the highest GPR quartile exhibited significantly elevated risks of 28-day (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.08–1.75; P=0.010) and 90-day mortality (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.54; P=0.034). Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrated significantly reduced survival probabilities with increasing GPR levels (log-rank P<0.0001). Restricted cubic spline analyses confirmed a significant positive association between GPR and mortality without evidence of nonlinearity.

Conclusions: GPR, as an accessible biochemical marker integrating metabolic stress and coagulation–inflammatory status, was independently associated with short- and intermediate-term mortality in critically ill patients with ischemic stroke. These findings suggest that GPR may serve as a clinically applicable indicator of systemic metabolic–coagulation dysregulation and may contribute to early risk stratification in critical care settings.

References

1. Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins SO, Pandian J, Lindsay P, et al. World Stroke Organization: Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2025. International Journal of Stroke : Official Journal of the International Stroke Society. 2025;20(2):132-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241308142.
2. GBD SC. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. Neurology. 2021;20(10):795-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0.
3. Burkard P, Vögtle T, Nieswandt B. Platelets in Thrombo-Inflammation: Concepts, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Strategies for Ischemic Stroke. Hamostaseologie. 2020;40(2):153-64. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1151-9519.
4. Stoll G, Nieswandt B. Thrombo-inflammation in acute ischaemic stroke - implications for treatment. Nature Reviews. Neurology. 2019;15(8):473-81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0221-1.
5. Stegner D, Klaus V, Nieswandt B. Platelets as Modulators of Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02505.
6. Huang Y, Li Z, Yin X. Stress hyperglycemia and risk of adverse outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1219863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1219863.
7. Yu Y, Rao Z, Duan T, Zhang Y, Zhu C. Association between stress hyperglycaemia ratio and admission stroke severity: a retrospective study in a Chinese single-centre cohort. Bmj Open. 2025;15(9):e105117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105117.
8. Wang L, Cheng Q, Peng M, Lv D, Zi W, Xu G, et al. The relationship between the platelet to leukocyte ratio and mechanical thrombectomy outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. Neurol Res. 2020;42(10):890-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2020.1790868.
9. Liu H, Yang K, Wang S, Ge J. Advancements in research on the thrombo-inflammation mechanisms mediated by factor XII in ischemic stroke. J Thromb Thrombolys. 2025;58(5):608-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03101-6.
10. Chen L, Chen N, Lin Y, Ren H, Huang Q, Jiang X, et al. Glucose to Platelet Ratio: A Potential Predictor of Hemorrhagic Transformation in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Brain Sci. 2022;12(9):1170. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091170.
11. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet (London, England). 2007;370(9596):1453-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
12. Johnson AEW, Bulgarelli L, Shen L, Gayles A, Shammout A, Horng S, et al. MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset. Sci Data. 2023;10(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x.
13. Austin PC, White IR, Lee DS, van Buuren S. Missing Data in Clinical Research: A Tutorial on Multiple Imputation. The Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;37(9):1322-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2020.11.010.
14. Blazek K, van Zwieten A, Saglimbene V, Teixeira-Pinto A. A practical guide to multiple imputation of missing data in nephrology. Kidney Int. 2021;99(1):68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.07.035.
15. Pacinella G, Ciaccio AM, Tuttolomondo A. Molecular Links and Clinical Effects of Inflammation and Metabolic Background on Ischemic Stroke: An Update Review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(24):7515. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247515.
16. Tudor T, Spinazzi EF, Alexander JE, Mandigo GK, Lavine SD, Grinband J, et al. Progressive microvascular failure in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and time-course analysis. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism: Official Journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2024;44(2):192-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X231216766.
17. Merlino G, Pez S, Gigli GL, Sponza M, Lorenzut S, Surcinelli A, et al. Stress Hyperglycemia in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy. Front Neurol. 2021;12:725002. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.725002.
18. Kanazawa K, Miyamoto N, Hira K, Kijima C, Ueno Y, Hattori N. Baseline platelet count may predict short-term functional outcome of cerebral infarction. Bmc Neurol. 2022;22(1):314. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02845-5.
19. Yao M, Hao Y, Wang T, Xie M, Li H, Feng J, et al. A review of stress-induced hyperglycaemia in the context of acute ischaemic stroke: Definition, underlying mechanisms, and the status of insulin therapy. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1149671. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1149671.
20. Brownlee M. Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature. 2001;414(6865):813-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/414813a.
21. Takenaka K, Yamagishi S, Matsui T, Nakamura K, Imaizumi T. Role of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in thrombogenic abnormalities in diabetes. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2006;3(1):73-7. https://doi.org/10.2174/156720206775541804.
22. Chen J, Chen J, Chen S, Zhang C, Zhang L, Xiao X, et al. Transfusion of CXCR4-primed endothelial progenitor cells reduces cerebral ischemic damage and promotes repair in db/db diabetic mice. Plos One. 2012;7(11):e50105. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050105.
23. Iba T, Helms J, Connors JM, Levy JH. The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Intensive Care. 2023;11(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00672-5.
Published
2026/05/11
Section
Original paper