VARIABILITY OF AGRONOMIC TRAITS IN VEGETABLE PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.) GENOTYPES
Abstract
In the course of this study, a total of 12 vegetable pea genotypes of different vegetation period were subjected to phenotypic characterization. The vegetable pea genotypes are a part of the collection maintained at the Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops Novi Sad. The plant material included 10 promising lines and two released cultivars, Tamiš and Dunav. The trial was carried out in 2022. It was set up at the Rimski Šančevi site, as a randomized block design in five replications. A total of 14 agronomic traits were analyzed. The obtained research results revealed divergence in the investigated plant material. The statistical significance of all sources of variation was determined by the LSD test. The height of the first fertile node stood out as the most variable feature, with a coefficient of variation of 40.54%. The tested genotypes were clustered into two groups and two subgroups within the second group. The correlation analysis of the examined quantitative traits revealed the existence of several statistically significant positive and negative correlations. Some of the most significant positive correlations were established between grain weight per plant and the number of grains per plant and the yield of technologically mature grain, while pod width and the number of fertile nodes per plant had the most negative correlations with the other tested traits.
References
Afreen, S., Singh, A. K., Moharana, D. P., Singh, V., Singh, P., & Singh, B. (2017). Genetic evaluation for yield and yield attributes in garden pea (Pisum sativum var. hortense L.) under North Indian gangetic plain conditions. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6 (2), 1399-1404. http://dx.doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.602.158
Arunadevi, K., Singh, M., Franco, D., Prajapati, V. K., Ramachandran J., & Maruthi S. G. R. (2022). Real Time Soil Moisture (RTSM) Based Irrigation Scheduling to Improve Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Green Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Grown in North India" Agronomy, 12 (2), 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020278
Barcchiya, J., Naidu, A. K., Mehta, A. K., & Upadhyay, A. (2018). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield components in pea (Pisum sativum L.). International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6 (2), 3324-3327. https://dx.doi.org/10.22271/chemi
Bardisi, S., & Zyada, H. (2021). Combining ability and heterosis for yield and quality traits in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Scientific Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3 (2): 78-86. https://doi.org/10.21608/sjas.2021.106304.1167
Castaldo, L., Izzo, L., Gaspari, A., Lombardi, S., Rodríguez-Carrasco, Y., Narváez, A., Grosso, M., & Ritieni, A. (2021). Chemical Composition of green pea (Pisum sativum L.) pods extracts and their potential exploitation as ingredients in nutraceutical formulations. Antioxidants, 11 (1), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11010105
Ceyhan, E., Avci, M. A., & Karadas, S. (2008). Line x tester analysis in pea (Pisum sativum L.): Identification of superior parents for seed yield and its components. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7 (16), 2810-2817.
Ceyhan, E. & Avci, M. A. (2015). Determination of some agricultural characters of developed pea (Pisum sativum L.) lines. International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, 9 (12), 1235-1238. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1110331
Červenski, J., Gvozdanović-Varga, J., Vasić, M., Stojanović, A., Medić-Pap, S., Danojević, D. & Savić, A. (2016). Home gardens and backyards – suitable area for vegetable production. Acta Horticulturae, 1142, 179-186. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1142.28
Červenski, J., Medić-Pap, S., & Ignjatov, M. (2021). Proizvodnja konzumnog graška. In A. M. Jeromela (Ed.), Zbornik referata, 55. Savetovanje agronoma i poljoprivrednika Srbije (SAPS) (pp. 23-32). Zlatibor, Serbia.
Dozet, G., Bošković, J., Galonja-Coghill, T., Zečević, V., Cvijanović, G., Jovićević, D., & Đukić, V. (2011). Effect of genotype and pre-sowing fertilization on yield of garden pea. Genetika, 43 (2), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1101041P
Dozet, G., Stanojević, S., Cvijanović, G., Ugrenović, V., Ugrinović, M., Jakšić, S., & Abuatwarat, S. (2018). Uticaj sorte i mikrobioloških đubriva na prinos baštenskog gaška u organskom povrtarenju. In G. Cvijanović & S. Savić (Ed.), Radovi sa XXXII savetovanja agronoma, veterinara, tehnologa i agroekonomista (pp. 153-160). Bačka Topola, Srbija.
Đinović, I., Lešić, R., Krsmanović, Ž., Perić, B., Ipša, F., Gligorijević, B., Kojić, Z., & Čermak, N. (1984). Grašak. Beograd: Novinsko-izdavačka radna organizacija Zadruga.
Đinović, I. (1986). Nasleđivanje komponenti prinosa zrna graška, proteina i vitamina u recipročnim ukrštanjima Pisum sativum var. Medullare x Pisum sativum ssp. Saccharatum. Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Poljoprivredni fakultet, Novi Sad, Srbija.
Đorđević, R., Cvikić, D., Đurić, N., Gavrilović, B., Đorđević Melnik, O., Živanović, T., & Prodanović, S. (2021). Selekcija industrijskih sorti graška u Institutu za povrtarstvo Smederevska Palanka. Zbornik radova, Biotehnologija i savremeni pristup u gajenju i oplemenjivanju bilja, Nacionalni naučno-stručni skup sa međunarodnim učešćem, (pp. 123-129). Smederevska Palanka, Srbija.
Đorđević, R., Damjanović, M., & Milošević, S. (2001). Golijat-srednje kasna afila sorta graška. Savremena poljoprivreda, 50 (1-2), 221-224.
El-Hak, S. G., Ahmed, A. M., & Moustafa, Y. M. M. (2012). Effect of foliar application with two antioxidants and humic acid on growth, yield and yield components of peas (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of horticultural science & ornamental plants, 4 (3), 318-328. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.jhsop.2012.4.3.262
Evans J. D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Monterey, CA, USA: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
Ghafoor, A., Ahmad, Z., & Anwar, R. (2005). Genetic diversity in Pisum sativum and a strategy for indigenous biodiversity conservation. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 37 (1), 71-77.
Greveniotis, V., Bouloumpasi, E., Zotis, S., Korkovelos, A., & Ipsilandis, C. G. (2021). Yield components stability assessment of peas in conventional and low-input cultivation systems. Agriculture, 11 (9), 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090805
Hanci, F. (2019). Genetic variability in peas (Pisum sativum L.) from Turkey asssessed with molecular and morphological markers. Folia Horticulturae, 31 (1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2019-0007
Jovićević, D., Jokanović, R. M., Gvozdanović-Varga, J., & Tepić, A., (2009). Characacteristics and suitability of some pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties for processing. Acta Horticulturae, 830 (1), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.830.9
Kalapchieva, S., & Yankova, V. (2019). Opportunities for growing of garden pea in organic production systems. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 106 (3), 227–232 https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2019.106.029
Kanižai Šarić, G., Milaković, Z., Rapčan, I., Majić, I., Šeput, J., & Kojić, D. (2016). Rast i prinos graška (Pisum sativum L.) pod utjecajem bakterizacije i gnojidbe dušikom. Agronomski glasnik: Glasilo Hrvatskog agronomskog društva, 78 (5-6), 205-214.
Khan, M. R. A., Mahmud, F., Reza, M. A., Mahbub, M. M., Shirazy, B. J., & Rahman, M. M. (2017). Genetic diversity, correlation and path analysis for yield and yield components of pea (Pisum sativum L.). World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13 (1), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wjas.2017.11.16
Kumar, M., Jeberson, M., Singh, N., Sharma, R., & Patel, R. S. (2018). Analysis of trait association and principal component of variability in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 7 (8), 437-441.
Kumar, S., Ali, B., Ahmed, W., Islam, R., Rahman, M. M., Chakma, M., & Miah, M. S. (2022). Assessment of the Genetic Variability for various Agronomic Traits of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes. Plant Archives, 22(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.51470/PLANTARCHIVES.2022.v22.no1.013
Kumar, V., Kumar, A., Singh, M. K., Kumar, M., & Kumar, U. (2017). Growth and Yield of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Azad P-1 as Influenced by NADEP Composts Prepared by Using Different Raw Materials. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6 (11), 2260-2267. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.268
Kumari, J., Dikshit, H.K., Singh, B., & Singh, D. (2015). Combining ability and character association of agronomic and biochemical traits in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 181, 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.10.051
Mohamed, A., García-Martínez, S., Loumerem, M., Carbonell, P., Ruiz, J. J., & Boubaker, M. (2019). Assessment of genetic diversity among local pea (Pisum sativum L.) accessions cultivated in the arid regions of Southern Tunisia using agro-morphological and SSR molecular markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 66 (6), 1189-1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-019-00784-8
Panwar, A., Mishra, A.C., & Negi, S. (2018). Correlation studies on seed quality, pod and seed yield in germplasm of pea (Pisum sativum L.). International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management, 9 (1), 098-102. https://doi.org/10.23910/IJBSM/2018.9.1.3C0753
Pavan, S., Delvento, C., Nazzicari, N., Ferrari, B., D’Agostino, N., Taranto, F., Lotti, C., Ricciardi, L., & Annicchiarico, P. (2022). Merging genotyping-by-sequencing data from two ex situ collections provides insights on the pea evolutionary history. Horticulture research, 9. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhab062
Radinović, I., Vasiljević, S., & Branković, G. (2022). Correlations of morpho-agronomic traits and forage quality properties in diverse red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) collections. Journal of Agricultural Sciences (Belgrade), 67 (2), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS2202139R
Timmerman-Vaughan G.M., Mills, A., Whitfield, C., Frew, T., Butler, R., Murray, S., Lakeman, M., McCallum, J., Russell, A., & Wilson, D. (2005). Linkage mapping of QTL for seed yield, yield components, and developmental traits in pea. Crop Science, 45 (4), 1336-1344.
Ton, A., Mart, D., Karaköy, T., Türkeri, M., Torun, A., & Anlarsal, A. E. (2022). Characterization of some local pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes for agro-morphological traits and mineral concentrations. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 46 (2), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-2109-89
Siddika, A., Islam, A. K. M. A., Rasul, M. G., Mian, M. A. K., & Ahmed, J. U. (2013). Genetic variability in advanced generations of vegetable pea (Pisum sativum L.). International Journal of Plant Breeding, 7 (2), 124-128.
Singh, B., & Prakash, R. (2022). Genetic analysis of yield and yield attributing components in pea: Genetic analysis of yield attributes in pea. Journal of AgriSearch, 9 (1), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.21921/jas.v9i01.9885
Singh, J., & Dhall, R. K. (2018). Genetic variability parameters of yield and quality attributes in vegetable pea (Pisum sativum L.). Genetika, 50 (1), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1801153S
Singh, S. R., Ahmed, N., Singh, D. B., Srivastva, K. K., Singh, R. K., & Mir, A. (2017). Genetic variability determination in garden pea (Pisum sativum L sub sp. hortense Asch. and Graebn.) by using the multivariate analysis. Legume Research-An International Journal, 40 (3), 416-422. https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v0i0.7300
Smith, J. S., Smith, O. S. (1989). The description and assessment of distance between inbreed lines of maize: The utility of morphological, biochemical and genetic descriptors and a scheme for testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines. Maydica, 34 (2), 151–161.
Stanimirović, N., Koprivica, R., & Veljković, B. (2011). Visina gubitaka u žetvi zelenog graška u zavisnosti od stanja useva i režima rada kombajna. Savremena poljoprivredna tehnika, 37 (1), 35-44.
Uher, D., Štafa, Z., Blažinkov, M., Pisačić, A., & Županac, G. (2009). Prinos i kakvoća zrna novog kultivara ozimog graška cv. Maksimirski rani u smjesi s pšenicom, Zbornik radova, 44. hrvatski i 4. međunarodni simpozij agronoma (pp. 657-661). Opatija, Hrvatska.
Woźniak, A., (2013). The yielding of pea (Pisum sativum L.) under different tillage conditions. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-Hortorum Cultus, 12 (2), 133-141.