(DIS)RESPECT OF THE SERBIAN CODE OF JOURNALISTS IN THE CAMPAIGN FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN 2017

  • Dinko A Gruhonjić University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy
Keywords: Serbia, monitoring, TELEVISION, campaigns, media, elections, ethical code,

Abstract


The paper presents a comparative analysis of several monitoring reports on the reporting of public media and commercial televisions with a national frequency during the campaign for the presidential elections in Serbia in 2017, with the aim of determining the extent and manner in which the Serbian Code of Journalists was violated. The monitorings, which, rather than being done by the competent state institutions such as the Regulatory Authority for Electronic Media (REM), were largely carried out by civil society organizations, unequivocally demonstrated that, in most cases, reporting was extremely biased in favor of the ruling coalition candidate Aleksandar Vučić. In addition to the fact that they violated the provisions of key media laws and reporting rules during the pre-election campaign, the editors and journalists of televisions also violated the Code of Journalists in various ways. The monitorings, on the one hand, have shown the inadmissible bias of the majority of public and commercial televisions, but, on the other hand, have also shown that there were commercial cable televisions that largely took account of a uniform reporting on presidential candidates. Most of the analyzed televisions did not, however, abide by the preamble of the Code of Journalism, which states that the reason for the existence of media is public interest, and the business, political and private interests of the publisher/media owner should not be an excuse or justification for violating the Code. Most of the monitoring has also shown that the provisions of the Code of Journalism have been violated regarding the truthfulness of reporting, independence from pressures, journalists' accountability, and journalistic attention.

Author Biography

Dinko A Gruhonjić, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy
Docent na Odseku za medijske studije Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Novom Sadu

References

Biro za društvena istraživanja (2017). Mediji, javnost, izbori. Posećeno 27.07.2017. URL: http://www.birodi.rs/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Mediji-javnost-izbori-2017.pdf.

Cenzolovka (2017). REM neće pratiti medije tokom kampanje: „Nemaju parametre za softver“. Posećeno 27. avgusta 2017. URL: https://www.cenzolovka.rs/drzava-i-mediji/rem-nece-pratiti-medije-tokom-kampanje-nemaju-parametre-za-softver/.

Council of Europe (1999). Recommendation No. R (99) 15 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on measures concerning media coverage of election campaigns. Posećeno 03.10.2017. URL: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805e3c6b.

Council of Europe. (2005). Guidelines on Media Analysis during Election Observation Missions prepared in co-operation between the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, the Council of Europe’s Venice Commission and Directorate General of Human Rights, and the European Commission adopted by the Council for Democratic Elections at its 14th meeting (Venice, 20 October 2005) and the Venice Commission at its 64th plenary session (Venice, 21-22 October 2005). Posećeno 03.10.2017. URL: http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2005)032-e.

Council of Europe. (2007). Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on media pluralism and diversity of media content. Posećeno 03.10.2017. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression/committee-of-ministers-adopted-texts/-/asset_publisher/aDXmrol0vvsU/content/recommendation-cm-rec-2007-2-of-the-committee-of-ministers-to-member-states-on-media-pluralism-and-diversity-of-media-content?_101_INSTANCE_aDXmrol0vvsU_viewMode=view/.

European Audiovisual Observatory (2017). Media coverage of elections: the legal framework in Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) (2003). Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters: Guidelines and Explanatory Report Posećeno 03.10.2017. URL: http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2002)023rev-e.

Insajder (2017). REM: Nema odluke o praćenju ovih izbora, radićemo po prijavama. Posećeno 27.08.2017. URL: https://insajder.net/sr/sajt/tema/3268/.

Gruhonjić, D. (2009). Sloboda izražavanja u novinarstvu u uslovima ekonomskog ropstva. In Todorov, D. (ur.), Sloboda izražavanja i ljudska prava novinara u Vojvodini (pp. 41-44). Novi Sad: Pokrajinski ombudsman.

Kunczik, M. & Zipfel, A. (2006). Uvod u znanost o medijima i komunikologiju. Zagreb: Zaklada Friedrich Ebert.

Laitila, T. (1995). Journalistic Codes of Ethics in Europe. European Journal of Communication, 10: 527-544.

Media monitor (2017). BIRODI sprovodi monitoring medijskog izveštavanja tokom kampanje za predsedničke izbore. Posećeno 22.07.2017. URL: http://www.birodi.rs/birodi-sprovodi-monitoring-medijskog-izvestavanja-tokom-kampanje-za-predsednicke-izbore/.

Milivojević, S., Radojković, M., Milojević, A., Ugrinić, A. Raković, M. & Matović, M. (2011). Profesija na raskršću – novinarstvo na pragu informacionog društva. Beograd: Centar za medije i medijska istraživanja Fakulteta političkih nauka. Posećeno 03.10.2017. URL: http://centarzamedije.fpn.bg.ac.rs/content-files/Novinarstvo%20na%20pragu%20informacionog%20drustva.pdf-

Novosadska novinarska škola (2017). Finalni rezultati monitoringa predizborne kampanje. Posećeno 22.07. 2017. URL: http://www.novinarska-skola.org.rs/sr/?page_id=2347.

OSCE (1990). Document of the Copenhagen Meeting of the Conference on the Human Dimension of the OSCE. 29 June 1990. par. 7.8. Posećeno 03.10.2017. URL: http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/14304?download=true.

Pew Research Center (2016). The Modern News Consumer. Posećeno 01.10.2017. URL: http://www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/the-modern-news-consumer.

Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (2016). Digital News Report 2016. Posećeno 02.10.2017. URL: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital-News-Report-2016.pdf.

Savet za štampu. (2015a). Kodeks novinara Srbije – Uputstva i smernice. Beograd: DIA-ART.

Savet za štampu (2015b). Rezultati monitoringa poštovanja Kodeksa novinara u dnevnim novinama od aprila do decembra 2015. Posećeno 17.07.2017. URL: http://www.savetzastampu.rs/latinica/monitoring-postovanja-kodeksa-novinara-srbije/131/2016/09/28/1262/rezultati-monitoringa-postovanja-kodeksa-novinara-u-dnevnim-novinama-od-aprila-do-decembra-2015.html.

Savet za štampu (2016a). Rezultati monitoringa poštovanja Kodeksa novinara u dnevnim novinama od marta do avgusta 2016. Posećeno 17.06.2017. URL: http://www.savetzastampu.rs/latinica/monitoring-postovanja-kodeksa-novinara-srbije/131/2016/09/28/1263/rezultati-monitoringa-postovanja-kodeksa-novinara-u-dnevnim-novinama-od-marta-do-avgusta-2016.html.

Savet za štampu (2016b). Rezultati monitoringa poštovanja Kodeksa novinara u dnevnim novinama od marta do decembra 2016. Posećeno 17.06.2017. URL: http://www.savetzastampu.rs/latinica/monitoring-postovanja-kodeksa-novinara-srbije/131/2017/01/25/1364/rezultati-monitoringa-postovanja-kodeksa-novinara-u-dnevnim-novinama-od-marta-do-decembra-2016.html.

Skrozza, T. (2013). Medijski rat kao politika drugim sredstvima. Nedeljnik Vreme br. 1172. 20. jun 2013. Beograd.

Zakon o elektronskim medijima (2014). Službeni glasnik, br. 83/14.

Veljanovski, R. (2005). Javni RTV servis u službi građana. Beograd: Clio.

Vodinelić, V.V. (2012). Novinarski kodeksi i pravo medija u Srbiji: nedovoljno samodefinisanje. Pravni zapisi, III(1): 73-89.

Published
2017/12/17
Section
Professional Paper